Skip to content

Trump asserting authority over the Washington D.C. police force, with plans to dispatch the National Guard in the country's capital

Trump Vows Intensified Action Against Washington's Homeless Population and Criminals Over Weekend

Trump claims authority over the law enforcement of Washington D.C., planning to mobilize the...
Trump claims authority over the law enforcement of Washington D.C., planning to mobilize the National Guard within the national capital

Trump asserting authority over the Washington D.C. police force, with plans to dispatch the National Guard in the country's capital

In August 2025, President Trump announced the deployment of over 2,000 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in an effort to combat crime and homelessness in the capital [1]. This deployment, which includes personnel from D.C. and six other states, is primarily operating under Title 32, with the D.C. National Guard falling under federal command due to the district's unique status [1].

The mission involves securing monuments, protecting federal buildings, supporting the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), and enhancing community safety [1][2]. However, the Department of Justice has reported a significant decrease in crime rates across a wide range of indicators, with homicides down 32%, robberies down 39%, armed carjackings down 53%, assaults with a dangerous weapon down 27%, and the fewest assaults with dangerous weapons and burglaries in over 30 years [5].

President Trump has asserted federal control over the MPD, attempting to appoint federal personnel and using legal mechanisms to control local law enforcement operations. However, this move has been met with resistance, with a judge recently rejecting Trump’s appointment of a new head of the MPD [3]. The legal landscape is uncertain, and ongoing lawsuits from D.C. city officials are anticipated to challenge the scope of presidential authority in this context [3].

Critics view these actions as an abuse of power that may threaten public safety and undermine local governance, while supporters argue the measures are necessary for law and order. The overall impact includes increased federal and National Guard presence in the capital, legal controversy over the limits of presidential control of local police, and a politicized debate about public safety in Washington, D.C. [1][3][4].

The immediate impact of Trump's action appeared less sweeping and dramatic than his social media posts suggested. Greg Evans, a 38-year-old who has lived in a homeless encampment near the Lincoln Memorial for several months, expressed worry about potential displacement. Evans has struggled with addiction and health problems [6].

Trump's rhetoric has been met with disappointment by some locals, such as George Morgan, a 65-year-old who lives in a tent camp near the Lincoln Memorial. Morgan believes the U.S. should use more of its wealth to help people who need housing and health care [7]. Mayor Bowser acknowledged Trump's concerns about homelessness but argued that the situation has improved [8].

This deployment follows Trump's previous move in June, when he deployed National Guard soldiers on the streets of Los Angeles [9]. The future of this intervention in Washington, D.C., remains uncertain, with ongoing legal challenges and a divided public opinion.

  1. The government's policy and legislation regarding war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, and community safety has been a topic of intense debate, following President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C.
  2. The general news of President Trump's assertion of federal control over local law enforcement operations, particularly the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), has sparked controversy and resistance within the community.
  3. As part of Trump's mission to combat crime and homelessness, the news also includes reports of the government's use of Title 32 for deploying troops, with a focus on securing monuments, protecting federal buildings, and supporting the MPD.
  4. In spite of the decreased crime rates reported by the Department of Justice, the ongoing legal disputes and challenges, as well as the politicized debate about public safety, have raised concerns about the potential impact on the community and local governance.

Read also:

    Latest