Skip to content

Trump advocates for the dismissal of journalists regarding a controversial report about Iran

Malicious Individuals Found to Act Negatively, Disregarding Moral Standards

Trump advocates for the dismissal of journalists in relation to an article on Iran
Trump advocates for the dismissal of journalists in relation to an article on Iran

Trump's Rant on Journalists Over Iran Report

Unhinged Demand for Firings

Trump advocates for the dismissal of journalists regarding a controversial report about Iran

In a typical Tuesday tweet storm, Trump demanded the canning of reporters from CNN and the New York Times for reporting on classified intel regarding the strike against Iran. he barked, "Fake-ass reporters from CNN & 'The New York Times' need to get the boot - stat!" Calling them "shitty individuals with wicked intentions."

The Fuss Over Intel

Trump's axe wielding spree comes after reports emerged that the strike did not completely blast Iran's nuclear facilities as he claimed. Guess it's all his little word against their documents and intel.

Sound Familiar?

While shit-talking the media is nothing new, it's highly unusual for a head of a democratic nation to openly call for the sacking of journalists. For instance, in Germany, that's simply not a thing. Press freedom is enshrined in their constitution.

The New York Times admitted that Trump threatened them with a lawsuit and begged for an apology. Their lawyer said, "Ain't gonna happen, buddy!"

What's With Trumps's Act?

CNN and The New York Times reported on a classified DIA assessment that cast a shadow on Trump's portrayal of the extent of the damage wreaked on Iran's nuclear facilities. The clarity of the damages is yet to be seen.

Historically Spineless

Publicly firing journalists hasn't been a common practice historically, particularly in democratic countries. However, recent years, particularly under Trump, have seen more and more direct calls for punitive actions against journalists and outlets.

Trump isn't shy about calling out specific reporters, recently over coverage of his administration's actions in Iran, labeling their work as "fake news" and accusing them of ruining reputable news organizations. His verbal aggressions have included calls for major outlets like CNN and the New York Times to "immediately fire" journalists who have reported critically on his policies or contradicted his claims.

Trump's approach to the press – calling them "enemies of the people," "hacks," and "skanks" – stands out for its frequency and intensity compared to prior presidents.

Implications for Press Freedom

  • The Chilling Effect: Publicly calling for the firing of journalists can pressure reporters and editors into holding back or softening critical coverage out of fear of repercussions or getting the axe.
  • Weakening Public Trust: When a president discredits the media and rambles on about lawsuits, it can undermine public trust in both the media and democratic institutions.
  • Normalizing Hostility: Such aggressive rhetoric can normalize contentious relations between government officials and the media, weakening the media's role as a watchdog and advocate for transparency.
  • Precedent for Harassment: If other bigwigs and leaders follow suit, it could encourage more attempts to silence critical voices through public shaming, threats, or other forms of harassment.

Got it? The President of the United States wants to fire journalists who are doing their damn jobs. Scary, huh? Thought so.

Despite the European Union's foreign policy being a focus on politics within general-news contexts, it's alarming to see the President of the United States calling for the firing of journalists, a practice that could set a crime-and-justice precedent for harassment in democratic nations. Such aggressive rhetoric towards the media, diluting public trust, could also have a chilling effect on press freedom within these countries.

Read also:

    Latest