The End of the Debt Brake: A Giant Leap Forward, But With a Huge Responsibility
- by Timo Pache
- 3 Min
Adequate reform is necessary, but 500 billion is merely an initial step. - tremendously necessary changes, but 500 billion is merely an initial step
Two years of debates led to the introduction of a debt brake in the Basic Law. In 2009, just a few months after the onset of the global financial crisis, it was finally approved by the federal and state governments. For 16 years, it worked effectively, and for the most part, it was considered a success in public debate - Germany as the beacon of stability in Europe was the usual narrative. While it was slightly oversold, it struck a chord with the majority.
It took less than three weeks, and some breathtaking political maneuvers, to undo this debt brake in the Basic Law, if not eliminate it entirely. Politics goes beyond problem-solving - it's all about power, ministries, alliances, careers, and occasionally, image. Today's decision to reform the debt brake is right and long overdue, crucial for forming a viable new government coalition after the federal election. However, the process left much to be desired, despite the historic importance of today's decision.
Goodbye to the Debt Brake: Time to Spend the Special Assets
Friedrich Merz now has the green light to negotiate his government coalition with one of the largest financial mandates a federal chancellor has ever had. Not only can he significantly increase the military budget this year, but he is also obligated - unlike his predecessors - to invest ½ a trillion euros into the country's infrastructure within 12 years through the new special asset. Or at least lay the groundwork for it.
For Merz, this is just the beginning: the real challenge of his upcoming term will be to set the country and its administration up so it can manage to spend such a massive amount of money wisely within such a short time frame. Past experiences show that large investment and economic stimulus programs took years to materialize, and some, like the Digital Pact School, still have significant portions of the money stuck in files and project applications instead of equipment and networks.
Germany Needs Real Reforms
To spend the 500 billion for infrastructure and climate protection sensibly, Germany needs real reforms in its structures: in public administration and in the bodies of the statutory social security funds. The state needs faster and more efficient planning and approval processes, and in some cases, even more staff and better-qualified personnel. But at the same time, it will also have to withdraw in many areas.
Because all this money can trigger a real growth boom in the country only if the state allows it. If it doesn't replace further private investments by companies with public ones, but even encourages them. Many billions from the special asset are already earmarked, for the railway, for new roads, for schools, for the expansion of power grids - the need is everywhere.
The art, and the task, for Friedrich Merz in the next four years will be to decide where the state should invest - where it should hold back to give precedence to private investors. Or where it should create more attractive conditions to ensure that the state doesn't have to subsidize and invest, but private companies take over this task because they find it profitable. Only then will the 500 billion become a real growth package that propels the country forward.
Capital
Capital is a partner brand of the stern. Selected content can be viewed with your stern subscription. More from Capital can be found at www.stern.de/capital.
- Debt Brake
- Friedrich Merz
- Reform Step
- Bundestag
Strategies for Balancing Public and Private Investments:
- Clear Project Prioritization:
- Focus on high-impact projects with great potential for economic growth, environmental impact, and social benefits.
- Ensure that project selection and funding decisions are transparent and subject to rigorous evaluation to prevent misallocation of resources.
- Encourage Private Sector Participation:
- Foster Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to leverage private sector expertise and capital.
- Offer incentives such as tax breaks or subsidies for private companies investing in climate-friendly infrastructure projects.
- Regulatory Framework:
- Simplify regulatory processes to reduce bureaucratic hurdles for both public and private investors.
- Implement policies that encourage sustainable investments and discourage projects that could hinder climate goals.
- Monitoring and Evaluation:
- Establish clear metrics to monitor the impact of investments on economic growth, job creation, and environmental outcomes.
- Conduct regular audits to ensure that funds are being used efficiently and effectively.
- Integration with EU Policies:
- Ensure that investments align with broader EU climate and infrastructure goals to maximize synergies and avoid duplication of efforts.
- Foster collaboration with neighboring countries to enhance regional connectivity and economic integration.
- The employment policy, as part of the community policy, should be reformed to ensure the efficient allocation of the unprecedented 500 billion euros special asset for infrastructure and climate protection.
- A clear and transparent system is needed for prioritizing projects, encouraging private sector participation, and monitoring their impact, to prevent misuse of the funds and achieve the desired economic growth, job creation, and environmental benefits.
- Deliberations on employing staff and qualified personnel in public administration should be carried out to streamline planning and approval processes, allowing for timely and effective investment decisions in compliance with EU policies and sustainable climate goals.
