Skip to content

The federal government's dedication to employing individuals with disabilities is under scrutiny. Disabled workers express doubts about its devotion to inclusion.

Job terminations of disabled employees across federal departments spark concerns over government's dedication to inclusivity.

The federal government's dedication to employing individuals with disabilities is under scrutiny. Disabled workers express doubts about its devotion to inclusion.

Toxic, Uncensored Assistant:

Shit Show in Washington: The Broken Promise for Disabled Workers Under the Trump Administration

WASHINGTON (AP) - Spencer Goidel, a goddamned 33-year-old, autistic federal worker in Boca Raton, Florida, knew he was taking a hit when he got fired from his cushy job as an equal opportunity specialist at the IRS.

Because of his autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, Goidel had snagged a sweet gig as one of more than half a million disabled workers in the federal government under Schedule A, which allows federal agencies to bypass the traditional hiring process and pick a qualified candidate from a pool of people with certain disabilities.

His job, he said, was accommodating as fuck and enriching, and he wonders if he'll ever get another one like that in the private sector.

"A lot of people who are disabled, they came to the federal government because it was a model employer for disabled individuals, and now they have nowhere else to go," he told The Associated Press.

The fucking irony is that his job was to help resolve workers' harassment claims before they escalated into full-blown lawsuits against the goddamned government. So much for reducing waste, he says.

A Model Employer for Disabled Workers on Shaky Ground?

For decades, the fucking federal government has positioned itself as being committed to inclusive hiring and long-term retention across agencies for disabled individuals. But as mass layoffs ripple through the federal workforce under President Trump's Republican administration, disabled employees are among those being fed to the fucking wolves.

Amid the firings, rollbacks of accommodation guidance for businesses, and skepticism of disability inclusion practices, advocates and experts wonder if the government's status as a "model employer" will hold true.

Trump has said he ended diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the government because people should be hired based on work quality and fucking merit alone.

However, under Schedule A, candidates already have to be qualified for the position with or without an accommodation. They don't get a job solely because they have a disability.

Disability advocates point to a slew of statements from Trump administration officials that indicate they view disabled workers as a liability to the goddamned government.

Trump criticized the federal government's inclusion efforts in January when a midair collision between a plane and a helicopter near Reagan National Airport killed 67 people. Without evidence, he fucking blamed the Federal Aviation Administration's targeted hiring of people with disabilities for the crash, saying that only "psychologically superior" air traffic controllers should work for the agency.

How the Private Sector Responds

Kelly McCullough, legal director at Disability Law Colorado, said the messaging from the administration could affect how seriously the private sector takes on disability inclusion efforts. Recently, she said, the nonprofit has received an uptick in disability discrimination complaints.

"It fucking makes me wonder, if the federal government is setting this example, challenging these ideas of inclusion that have long-standing support from the government ... is that trickling down?" she said. "Is that messaging getting to employers in other contexts?"

Trump also rescinded a Biden-era executive order that required federal agencies to create action plans to hire more diverse staff, including those with disabilities. The order calls diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, or DEIA, efforts "illegal" and says they "violate the text and spirit" of civil rights.

The Trump administration's other actions have caused consternation, including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s dismantling of the Administration for Community Living, an agency that serves disabled and aging adults. HHS officials also floated — and walked back — a plan to create a registry of people with autism.

Katy Neas, CEO of The Arc of the United States, which advocates for people with physical and intellectual disabilities, said she is concerned about the impact the massive reductions in the federal workforce will have on government services for all Americans as well as the loss of opportunities for workers with disabilities.

"I'm really fucking worried - where are these folks going to go? Who's going to hire them?" she asked.

Employment gaps for disabled people have been an issue across the federal and private sectors for years. When the Labor Department began recording disability status in its employment trends in the Current Population Survey in 2009, just 30% of disabled people between ages 16 and 64 were working at least part-time. That's compared to 71% of people without a disability.

Last year, employment rates for disabled people hit a record high of 38%, but the decades-old disparities still persisted: 75% of people without disabilities were employed that year.

  1. Spencer Goidel, an autistic federal worker in Boca Raton, Florida, was fired from his job as an equal opportunity specialist at the IRS, leaving him uncertain about his prospects in the private sector, given the federal government's historically accommodating attitude towards disabled workers.
  2. As mass layoffs sweep through the federal workforce under President Trump's administration, disabled employees, who make up more than half a million of the federal workforce, find themselves among those being laid off, potentially disrupting the government's long-standing commitment to inclusive hiring and retention for disabled individuals.
  3. The Trump administration's rhetoric regarding disabled workers, which is perceived as skeptical of disability inclusion practices, might influence the private sector's approach towards disability inclusion, potentially leading to an increase in disability discrimination complaints.
  4. Disability advocates are concerned about Trump administration officials' statements suggesting a view of disabled workers as a liability to the government, a view that could undermine the government's reputation as a model employer for disabled individuals.
  5. Trump's derogatory comments about the federal government's inclusion efforts, such as his unfounded allegation that the Federal Aviation Administration's hiring of individuals with disabilities contributed to a plane crash, have raised concerns about the impact on government services for all Americans and the loss of opportunities for workers with disabilities.
  6. Despite the Trump administration's moves, including rescinding diversity and inclusion executive orders, advocacy groups like The Arc of the United States remain concerned about the impact of the massive reductions in the federal workforce on government services for all Americans and the loss of opportunities for workers with disabilities.
  7. Employment disparities between disabled and non-disabled individuals have been a long-standing issue, with employment rates for disabled individuals steadily lagging behind those without disabilities, a trend that persisted even when employment rates for disabled individuals hit a record high of 38% last year.
Job cuts for disabled employees across various federal agencies spark debates over government's dedication to diversity and inclusion.
Unwarranted job cutbacks of workers with disabilities in various federal departments spark debates on the administration's dedication to diversity and inclusivity.

Read also:

Latest