Skip to content

Tension Flows between Trump and Netanyahu over Controversial Topics of Iran and Gaza Strips

Hostage families urged Trump for intervention with Netanyahu

Hostage families pleaded with Trump to intervene in negotiations with Netanyahu
Hostage families pleaded with Trump to intervene in negotiations with Netanyahu

Tension Flows between Trump and Netanyahu over Controversial Topics of Iran and Gaza Strips

Shake-Up in Middle East Diplomacy: Trump and Netanyahu at Odds

The upcoming visit of President Donald Trump to the Middle East is shrouded in tense anticipation, as the United States President and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seem far from finding common ground. Although a meeting between the two leaders hasn't been scheduled yet, their relationship remains strained.

The New York Times reports dissatisfaction from Netanyahu's end regarding the U.S. decision to halt strikes on the Houthis in Yemen and initiate dialogue with Iran. Additionally, Netanyahu's congratulatory message to President Joe Biden on his 2020 victory did not sit well with President Trump.

Disagreements between the two aren't limited to the above. The publication also highlights contrasting views on Gaza. On one side, the United States administration strives for prisoner releases, while Netanyahu pushes for continuing the military campaign. The U.S. President tends to avoid critiquing Israeli authorities' actions publicly.

CNN names Trump's approach to Iran as the main source of contention for the Israeli side. In private, Netanyahu is said to regard Trump's talks with Iran as a mere waste of time.

The White House calendar marks Trump's Middle East visit from May 13 to 16. During this tour, the President plans to visit Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.

Previously, Netanyahu referred to Israel's "Great Victory" as not only referring to the Gaza Strip but also encompassing the entire Middle East region.

Understanding the Controversy

The underlying disagreements between the US President and the Israeli Prime Minister revolve around several key aspects:

  • Iran: Trump advocates for diplomatic resolutions, like phone calls and sanctions, to tackle Iran's nuclear program. Netanyahu, meanwhile, prefers a far more aggressive stance that entails military action.
  • Gaza: Trump is adamant about ending the conflict in Gaza, which has persisted for almost 600 days. He becomes frustrated by the continual violence, especially its impact on Palestinian children. In contrast, Netanyahu keeps pressing for military operations in Gaza due to pressure from his far-right coalition.
  • Palestinians and Normalization: A majority of Israelis support normalization with Saudi Arabia, provided the Gaza war ends and a Palestinian state is created. However, Netanyahu's government's stance largely contradicts public opinion and regional diplomatic realities. The Abraham Accords, a framework for broader regional peace, may encounter obstacles due to Israeli annexation plans and the ongoing Gaza conflict.

In essence, tensions between Trump and Netanyahu stem largely from differing approaches to conflicts, with Trump advocating for diplomacy and a more cautious approach to military action. The stalemate relating to Gaza and the contrasting visions of peace in the Middle East create a complex dynamics in these leaders' relations.

In the context of the ongoing disputes between the US President and the Israeli Prime Minister, the disagreements primarily revolve around three key aspects:

  • Iran: Trump advocates for a diplomatic approach, including phone calls and sanctions, to address Iran's nuclear program, while Netanyahu supports a more aggressive stance, involving potential military action.
  • Gaza: Trump supports ending the prolonged conflict, lasting nearly 600 days, due to concerns about the impact on Palestinian children, whereas Netanyahu continues to advocate for military operations.
  • Palestinians and Normalization: Despite a majority of Israelis supporting normalization with Saudi Arabia under certain conditions, Netanyahu's government's stance often contradicts public opinion and regional diplomatic realities, which may pose challenges for the implementation of the Abraham Accords and potential peace negotiations in the Middle East.

Read also:

Latest