Tennis athlete from Germany expresses fury over what she deems as the most regrettable choice in her professional journey.
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp E-Mail Print Copy Link
A storm brews at Wimbledon as German tennis pro Tamara Korpatsch fights an uphill battle to make it to the main draw, ending in heartbreak due to a bizarre umpiring error. It's about a net post, Korpatsch roars in protest, to no avail.
At first, the odds seemed to be in Korpatsch's favor. She was cruising through the first round of Wimbledon qualifying with a domineering 6:1 win in just 26 minutes. However, things took a turn for the worse when Korpatsch was subjected to an infamous umpiring blunder - a net post controversy.
The 30-year-old athlete, ranked 157th in the world, lost to her Slovakian opponent Renata Jamrichova, despite an impressive break at 3:2 in the second set. But after breaking back to 4:4, Korpatsch lost another game and the set. In the decisive third set, things took a shocking twist.
At 2:2, Korpatsch returned a serve with her two-handed backhand and hit the ball onto the single net post, as per the rules, as it bounced back into the court. The umpire, however, quickly halted play and deemed the shot a fault using the "wrong post" rule. This rule is unique to doubles courts, as they use two single posts to tighten the net, but they can be hit in a singles match, unlike the further-out doubles posts. Instead of scoring 30:30, it was 40:15, and Jamrichova soon held her serve.
Korpatsch's Outburst: "That's Insanity"
"This decision is the epitome of absurdity," Korpatsch vented on Instagram. "This happened at Wimbledon, the most renowned and prestigious tournament of the world, not some minor ITF competition," she expressed her fury and dismay.
On the court, Korpatsch stormed towards the umpire, even her opponent showing signs of confusion. "The ball hit the outer post, not the single post," the chair umpire explained, basing her decision on obvious misinformation. The frustrated German argued, "It hit here," as she gestured towards the single post.
"No, no, no," Korpatsch countered, demanding the umpire reconsider her decisions. "It's impossible for the ball to bounce off the doubles post like that," she explained, growing more agitated. "Look at the video. This isn't possible," she said, explaining how the ball's trajectory made contact with the single post. The umpire still remained adamant, insisting it was a fault. "Everyone could see it was a terrible call," Korpatsch ultimately conceded, before bursting out a frustrated exclamation across the court, and writing on Instagram, "I'm sick of grass." After the commotion, she lost the third set 5:7 and the match. Jamrichova also fell short of the main draw, losing in the second round of qualifying.
The Strange World of Tennis Net Posts
In professional tennis, such disputes often occur around the net or its posts when the ball interacts with them in unusual ways. Yet, the enigmatic world of net posts has been known to influence matches, with specific incidents where the net or its posts were implicated in contentious calls or technical difficulties impacting match results.
For instance, when a ball seemingly interacts with the net in peculiar ways—like passing through a tear or the net giving way—the chair umpire must make quick judgments as to whether play should continue or the point should be replayed. This is because faulty net integrity can unjustly sway the result of a point. The umpire's role is crucial as the final authority in interpreting such situations on court. In a recent match at Eastbourne, a net malfunction during a point led to confusion before rapid repairs were made after a player pointed out a tear allowing a ball to pass through, requiring the chair umpire's confirmation before play resumed[4].
Applying this to Wimbledon qualifying matches, the "net post rule" would imply that if the ball touches or interacts with the net posts or the net in a manner that affects play, the umpire must assess if the point is valid or if it should be replayed. Issues like a damaged net or net post interference can spark controversy if the umpire's decision is contested.
In conclusion, the net and net posts at Wimbledon's tennis courts follow specific rules regarding height and position[1]. Controversies around the validity of points may arise when the net or posts malfunction, with recent examples suggesting that disputes can be common and cause discontent among players and fans. The umpire's role as the final authority in interpreting such situations on court, however, ensures that games proceed as smoothly as possible.
Tamara Korpatsch's distressing loss at Wimbledon qualifying was significantly influenced by a contentious umpiring decision regarding a net post. Despite dominating the first round, Korpatsch was frustrated by theapplication of the "wrong post" rule, which is usually applicable only in doubles courts, but led to a bizarre error in her singles match.
Though net post disputes are common in professional tennis, the instance at Wimbledon highlighted the confusion surrounding the rules and the influence such controversies can have on the outcome of matches. The fury expressed by Korpatsch underscores the importance of understanding these rules, particularly as they pertain to sports like tennis, where seemingly minor errors can lead to major consequences.
