Team assessment scores for every NFL club

Tennessee Titans: Grade B

Best Pick: QB Cameron Ward, No. 1 Overall

What We Liked: Tennessee put together a solid draft with a focus on offense. Ward was the top QB recruit for 2023 and possesses a confident playing style that should help reduce play-calling stress for his coordinators. His ability to handle pressure and complexity elevates the Titans' quarterback room. Wide receiver Elic Ayomanor (No. 136) and tight end Gunnar Helm (No. 120) offer reliable receiving options to assist Ward in getting acclimated to the professional level. Safety Kevin Winston Jr. (No. 82) highlights the defensive picks, maintaining a slot with a strong 2023 performance despite being injured.

Not So Sure: I'm still skeptical about Oluwafemi Oladejo (No. 52) being an effective edge rusher. He struggles to find the best fit in a defensive scheme, much like the concept of "positionless defenses." It felt like a stretch to select wide receiver Chimere Dike (No. 103) in the fourth round, another speedster who doesn't contribute much else to the team's depth.

Jacksonville Jaguars: Grade B

Best Pick: CB/WR Travis Hunter, No. 2 Overall

What We Liked: The Jaguars landed an impressive trade, securing two high-end players for the price of one. Travis Hunter's versatility and athleticism provide a major boost to the offense in his rookie year. General Manager James Gladstone has started off on a positive note, with several shrewd draft maneuvers. The pickup of Wyatt Milum (No. 89) solidifies the offensive line, and running back Bhayshul Tuten (No. 104) will complement Tank Bigsby well, alleviating pressure on Trevor Lawrence.

Not So Sure: Jacksonville seems to be moving players around from positions they excelled in during college. Caleb Ransaw (No. 88) played as a slot corner in 2023 and may struggle to adapt to a new position at safety. Jalen McLeod (No. 194) was billed as an edge rusher but showcased his skills as a linebacker in his college career. Similarly, Wyatt Milum is shifting from tackle to guard. Performing well in these positions will be critical to the team's depth for the upcoming season.

New York Giants: Grade C-

Best Pick: Edge Abdul Carter, No. 3 Overall

What we liked: Abdul Carter is a quality player who can pair with Brian Burns, improving the Giants' pass rush. Focusing on defense, especially the defensive trenches, was the right approach for a team with talent but inconsistent results. Darius Alexander (No. 65) is a solid pick at defensive tackle and should complement Dexter Lawrence. If the defense can become a top-10 unit next season, the moves made in this draft will appear insightful.

Not So Sure: Quarterback Jaxson Dart (No. 25) looks more like a product of a favorable system than a future franchise QB. Trading up to draft him seems a gamble, as Daniel Jones managed to push the ball downfield, albeit inconsistently. It remains to be seen whether Dart can lead the Giants to heights beyond Daniel Jones' tenure.

New England Patriots: Grade A

Best Pick: C Jared Wilson, No. 95 Overall

What We Liked: The Patriots put together a smart, solid draft class with a focus on logical decision-making and team building. Jared Wilson joins a developing offensive line, which appears to be taking shape under new head coach Mike Vrabel. TreVeyon Henderson (No. 38) should be able to carry the load at running back, supported by wide receiver Kyle Williams (No. 69).

Not So Sure: I remain cautious about Craig Woodson (No. 106) considering his issues with run-stopping. His development may take some time, making him a question mark in the team's secondary. Apart from that, the draft appears to be shaping up positively for New England.

Cleveland Browns: Grade B

Best Pick: Harold Fannin Jr., No. 67 Overall

What We Liked: The Browns added a number of talented players through this draft class, creating a potent group with potential. Defensive tackle Mason Graham (No. 5) brings intensity, scaring opponents with his play. Running back duo Quinshon Judkins (No. 36) and Dylan Sampson (No. 126) create an athletic agility that should complement the team well. Fannin adds a versatile weapon to the receiving corps, enhancing the offense's support system.

Not So Sure: A quarterback competition between Dillon Gabriel (No. 94) and Shedeur Sanders (No. 144) seems unnecessarily dramatic, possibly leading to distractions during the development process. The Browns have struggled to solve the quarterback position effectively in the past, leaving fans with concern regarding this latest endeavor.

Las Vegas Raiders: Grade A

Best Pick: RB Ashton Jeanty, No. 6 Overall

What We Liked: The Raiders netted a top-shelf pick, capitalizing on a blue-chip talent in Ashton Jeanty. Strengthening the offense was essential, and Jeanty's performance should help power the Raiders’ rushing attack. The remainder of the draft adds depth and versatility, showcasing potential high-floor prospects like Jack Bech (No. 58) and explosive swings like Dont'e Thornton Jr. (No. 108).

Not So Sure: The late defensive tackle picks lack notable skills and appear to have limited potential, possibly serving as rotational players at best. JJ Pegues (No. 180) moving to fullback is a cause for concern, risking a misuse of drafted talents if he doesn't pan out.

New York Jets: Grade B

Best Pick: OT Armand Membou, No. 7 Overall

What We Liked: The Jets had a strong start to the draft, capitalizing on quality picks for their first three selections. Membou adds athleticism to the offensive line, helping form a rushing powerhouse for Justin Fields and Breece Hall. Tight end Mason Taylor (No. 42) provides Fields with a strong outlet option, while cornerback Azareye'h Thomas (No. 73) can quickly adapt to the defense.

Not So Sure: The day three selections provided little excitement, with Arian Smith (No. 110) relying too heavily on his speed without offering other noteworthy attributes. Safety Malachi Moore (No. 196) possesses athletic potential but lacks the mental acuity required for consistent coverage success. Linebacker Francisco Mauigoa (No. 162) is a capable player, but it remains to be seen where he'll fit into the defense.

Carolina Panthers: Grade B

Best Pick: Edge Nic Scourton, No. 51 Overall

What We Liked: Obtaining two edge rushers (Scourton and Princely Umanmielen at No. 77) was a smart move to fill out the defensive line. Scourton's hand strength will wreak havoc on opposing offensive lines throughout the southeast division. The Panthers had successful draft results in the later rounds as well, especially with Lathan Ransom (No. 122) and Cam Jackson (No. 140).

Not So Sure: Tetairoa McMillan (No. 8) does not have the skill set required to make an immediate impact, and his addition seems redundant considering the talent Bryce Young already has at his disposal. Umanmielen (No. 77) lacks excitement as an edge rusher and may need more development before becoming a consistent contributer.

New Orleans Saints: Grade D

Best Pick: OT Kelvin Banks, No. 9 Overall

What We Liked: The Saints selected a complementary tackle in Banks, adding to their offensive line as they continue their conventional drafting philosophy. Jonas Sanker (No. 93) could address safety depth when the current generation starts to age, providing some versatility. Defensive tackle Quincy Riley (No. 131) adds some speed to the cornerback room.

Not So Sure: The Saints may have overvalued Tyler Shough (No. 40) given the concerns about his potential, which led to the unwanted comparison to Brandon Weeden. Quality weapons may be few and far between if the team struggles to prevent injuries and doesn't show improvement after a mediocre season in 2023.

Chicago Bears: Grade A-

Best Pick: OT Ozzy Trapilo, No. 56 Overall

What We Liked: The Bears yielded a balance between addressing needs and picking valuable players throughout the draft. Tight end Colston Loveland (No. 10) was a welcome surprise, enhancing Caleb Williams' options. The remaining picks offered protection and offensive weapons, such as Luther Burden III (No. 46) and Jared Wilson (No. 84), and promising defensive additions like Shemar Turner (No. 62) and Zah Frazier (No. 169).

Not So Sure: The selection of linebacker Ruben Hyppolite (No. 132) brought unwanted attention due to his relative obscurity. The Bears could have chosen a more proven player or addressed other pressing needs with that selection.

San Francisco 49ers: Grade C

Best Pick: LB Nick Martin, No. 75 Overall

What We Liked: The 49ers enjoyed some success in the middle rounds by finding solid players for reasonable prices. Linebacker Nick Martin and Jordan Watkins (No. 138) possess high-floor potential and could emerge as significant contributors.

Not So Sure: The early picks delivered underwhelming results, with Mykel Williams (11) failing to replicate his paper success on the field, and defensive tackle Alfred Collins (43) lacking the necessary strength and agility to make an impact. Improving the offensive line remains a priority that went unaddressed in this draft.

Dallas Cowboys: Grade C

Best Pick: CB Shavon Revel Jr., No. 76 Overall

What We Liked: Shavon Revel Jr.'s versatility and value in the third round could help stabilize the Cowboys' underperforming cornerback room. Guard Tyler Booker (No. 12) is a physical asset who fits well within the Cowboys' scheme.

Not So Sure: Edge Donovan Ezeiruaku (No. 44) shows promise, but may struggle to keep up with NFL-level athleticism. Running back Jaydon Blue (No. 46) appears to lack the capabilities necessary for a lead back role, and his impact could be limited to special teams.

Miami Dolphins: Grade C

Best Pick: DT Kenneth Grant, No. 13 Overall

What We Liked: The Dolphins addressed the departures of key players by adding replacements in defensive tackle Kenneth Grant and safety Dante Trader Jr. Offensive guard Jonah Savaiinaea (No. 37) complements Tua Tagovailoa by providing some protection from potential sacks.

Not So Sure: The late-round selections don't inspire confidence, with defensive tackle Jordan Phillips (No. 143) deficient in his development as a potential star and cornerback Jason Marshall Jr. (No. 150) lacking consistency on the field. The Dolphins may have focused on the wrong needs entering the draft.

Indianapolis Colts: Grade B

Best Pick: RB DJ Giddens, No. 151 Overall

What We Liked: The Colts drafted with an eye towards player value and addressing team needs. Tight end Tyler Warren (No. 14) and defensive tackle JT Tuimoloau (No. 45) show potential as solid contributors in the Colts' system. Running back DJ Giddens (No. 151) has the speed and versatility required for success.

Not So Sure: Riley Leonard (No. 189) appears miscast as a quarterback in the NFL, and his run-heavy skill set likely won't fit well into the Colts' existing offense. The team could have relied on more conventional draft picks to fill their remaining needs.

Atlanta Falcons: Grade B-

Best Pick: S Xavier Watts, No. 96 Overall

What we liked: The Falcons displayed a strong emphasis on value and potential with their day two selections. Edge Jalon Walker (No. 15), defensive tackle James Pearce Jr. (No. 26), and safety Xavier Watts (No. 96) show significant upside based on their physical attributes.

Not So Sure: The Falcons traded up using a future first-round pick for defensive tackle about whom there are character concerns. The draft could have been more complete with additional focus on the offense and addressing other pressing needs.

Arizona Cardinals: Grade A

Best Pick: CB Will Johnson, No. 47 Overall

What We Liked: The Cardinals struck gold in their draft, focusing on the best players available regardless of position. Cornerback Will Johnson (No. 47) and Walter Nolen (No. 16) dazzled scouts in 2023, providing immediate contributions to the defense. Jordan Burch (No. 78) and Cody Simon (No. 115) add promising depth to the edge and linebacker positions.

Not So Sure: The Cardinals took risks with selecting players with character concerns such as Jalen Starks (No. 27) and Jordan Stanton (No. 198). Their decisions may impact locker room chemistry if these players fail to live up to expectations.

Cincinnati Bengals: Grade B-

Best Pick: Edge Shemar Stewart, No. 17 Overall

What We Liked: Edge Shemar Stewart (No. 17) and tight end Elijah Arroyo (No. 50) should provide vital support for the Bengals' offense. The draft offered solid value by addressing primary team needs.

Not So Sure: Linebacker Barrett Carter (No. 119) may have been reached given the depth of linebackers at his position in the 2023 draft class. The selection of wide receiver Savion Williams (No. 90) was questioned due to concerns about his ability to contribute to an NFL offense that requires precision and technical skill.

Seattle Seahawks: Grade A-

Best Pick: S Nick Emmanwori, No. 35 Overall

What We Liked: Nick Emmanwori (No. 35) and tight end Elijah Arroyo (No. 50) offer instant value to the Seahawks, with the potential to contribute immediately. The draft showcased an emphasis on versatility and flexibility.

Not So Sure: The question marks surrounding undrafted players such as Tory Horton (No. 124) and wide receiver Savion Williams (No. 109) cast doubt upon their ability to make an NFL impact, particularly when compared to the notable talent available at those positions in the draft.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Grade A-

Best Pick: CB Jacob Parrish, No. 84 Overall

What We Liked: The Buccaneers strengthened their cornerback room and selected quality contributions for their defensive line in the draft. Pairing Benjamin Morrison (No. 53) and Jacob Parrish (No. 84) in the secondary should pay strong dividends.

Not So Sure: Edge David Walker (No. 121) lacks the experience necessary to compete at the NFL level, raising concerns about his ability to meet expectations as a pass rusher.

Denver Broncos: Grade C

Best Pick: CB Jahdae Barron, No. 20 Overall

What We Liked: The Broncos bolstered their secondary with impressive defensive backs Jahdae Barron (No. 20) and Greg Price Jr. (No. 48). Both have the potential to make immediate contributions.

Not So Sure: Running backs RJ Harvey (No. 60) and Tyler Nicolet (No. 147) appear to have limitations in their skill sets, causing doubts about their ability to perform at the NFL level, especially as a primary ball carrier.

Pittsburgh Steelers: Grade C-

Best Pick: DT Derrick Harmon, No. 21 Overall

What We Liked: Defensive tackle Derrick Harmon (No. 21) possesses the physicality required to succeed in the Steelers' defense, earning a starting role. The Steelers also showed a clear commitment to size, which favors their established run schemes.

Not So Sure: The Steelers neglected several pressing offensive needs in their draft, failing to draft a quarterback despite taking a gamble on Josh Dobbs in 2023 and allowing Ben Roethlisberger to retire. They missed opportunities to upgrade their receiver and offensive line positions.

Los Angeles Chargers: Grade B

Best Pick: WR Tre Harris, No. 55 Overall

What We Liked: Quarterback Justin Herbert should benefit immensely from the addition of Tre Harris (No. 55) as a reliable offensive weapon. The Chargers made shrewd picks, focusing on addressing team needs throughout the draft.

Not So Sure: The draft class features a number of questionable selections, such as RJ Harvey (No. 60) and Nolan Smith (No. 89). The team could have used later picks to address areas of weakness, like their offensive line and safety positions, rather than drafting players who may not be the best fit for their current roster.

Green Bay Packers: Grade C-

Best Pick: WR Matthew Golden, No. 23 Overall

What We Liked: Matthew Golden (No. 23) offers a legitimate threat as a deep ball receiver, potentially giving Jordan Love a valuable tool. The Packers drafted a number of qualities players with the emphasis on versatility and speed.

Not So Sure: The majority of the Packers' draft selections were criticized for their lack of immediate impact, as well as their reliance on players with injury concerns, such as Barryn Sorrell (No. 124) and Justin Murray (No. 159). The team needed to invest more in addressing pressing offensive line issues.

Minnesota Vikings: Grade B

Best Pick: WR Tai Felton, No. 102 Overall

What We Liked: The Vikings acquired a reliable possession receiver in Tai Felton (No. 102), who should form a strong trio with Justin Jefferson and Adam Thielen. Lotara Umunnakwe (No. 76) adds physicality to the secondary and could make an impact with his limited playing time at Ohio State.

Not So Sure: The Vikings failed to address their weak point at edge rusher, despite possessing the draft capital to do so. Their draft was relatively uneventful, with little standout talent.

Baltimore Ravens: Grade B

Best Pick: Malaki Starks, No. 27 Overall

What We Liked: The Ravens landed a talented player in Malaki Starks (No. 27), who offers versatility and will make an impact in the secondary. Baltimore prioritized versatility, especially with positions such as safety and edge rusher.

Not So Sure: Defensive tackle themes of concern persisted with this draft class, with Armon Watts (No. 97), Kellen Dotson (No. 174), and Yahtzee Shaw (No. 197) all being considered question marks due to their limited playing time during their college careers.

Detroit Lions: Grade B-

Best Pick: OG Miles Frazier, No. 171 Overall

What We Liked: The Lions drafted Miles Frazier (No. 171), a versatile lineman who is expected to contribute at multiple positions. Detroit showcased a commitment to size, which should appeal to their All-Pro running back, D'Andre Swift.

Not So Sure: The Lions made a questionable decision to trade up and draft Isaac TeSlaa (No. 70) using a future third-round pick, despite their offensive line showing consistent weakness. The team appears to have passed over players with better potential to fill that position during the draft.

Washington Commanders: Grade A-

Best Pick: Josh Conerly Jr., No. 29 Overall

What We Liked: The Commanders selected Josh Conerly Jr. (No. 29), a talented linebacker who should have an immediate impact on the second level of their defense. Andrew Mukuba (No. 64) is an exceptional talent who showcases elite athleticism and ball skills. Overall, this draft addresses several pressing needs and bolsters the Commanders' depth.

Not So Sure: The Commanders took a somewhat contentious gamble by passing on Trey Amos (No. 61) to select Jaheim Bell (No. 23), raising concerns about their valuation of the offensive positions. The team may have been better served by addressing their secondary and edge rush needs with their first pick.

Buffalo Bills: Grade A-

Best Pick: DT T.J. Sanders, No. 41 Overall

What We Liked: The Bills secured a quality defensive player in T.J. Sanders (No. 41) as a versatile piece that complements the team's existing talent. With depth and balance, Buffalo was able to select impact players through the later rounds.

Not So Sure: The Bills made questionable choices in the draft, such as selecting Javon Williams Jr. (No. 34) and Marlon Williams (No. 156) at running back. Their decision not to pursue an established veteran free agent at the position seems to have hurt the team's depth.

Philadelphia Eagles: Grade B

Best Pick: LB Jihaad Campbell, No. 31 Overall

What We Liked: The Eagles landed a versatile linebacker in Jihaad Campbell (No. 31), who should perform well in the team's limited-rush defense. General Manager Howie Roseman's commitment to finding quality players paid off with a productive draft.

Not So Sure: Day three lacked the potential impact that many had anticipated, with players such as Mac McWilliams (No. 145) and Smael Mondon Jr. (No. 161) failing to impress. Their lack of production casts doubt upon their ability to contribute in the NFL.

Kansas City Chiefs: Grade A-

Best Pick: WR Jalen Royals, No. 133 Overall

What We Liked: The Chiefs drafted an athletic and developed wide receiver in Jalen Royals (No. 133), who could quickly emerge as a reliable contributor. Kicker Kris Miller (No. 220) adds potential depth to the position.

Not So Sure: The Chiefs welcomed Osa Odighizuwa (No. 111) to the team, who has faced criticism for his public persona and inconsistent play. While his athletic potential is intriguing, his off-field issues concern teammates and coaches alike.

Houston Texans: Grade B

Best Pick: WR Jayden Higgins, No. 24 Overall

What We Liked: The Texans successfully addressed their need for a game-changing wide receiver in Jayden Higgins (No. 24), who offers a unique blend of speed and size. Offensive tackle Aireontae Ersery (No. 48) brings versatility and athleticism and could earn a starting role early on.

Not So Sure: Wide receivers Woody Marks (No. 116) and Ja'Mouria Stepp (No. 192) were reached during the draft, leading to concern about their ability to compete on a depth chart featuring established players. Their chances of making the team might prove minimal, especially early in their careers.

The Tennessee Titans selected QB Cameron Ward in the first round, which could potentially reduce play-calling stress for their coordinators.
In the same draft, the Titans also selected QB Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders, creating a potential quarterback competition that might cause distractions.
The Jacksonville Jaguars secured CB/WR Travis Hunter in the first round, a versatile player who could provide a major boost to their offense.
The New York Giants drafted edge Abdul Carter in the first round, a promising defensive pick that could improve their pass rush.
The New England Patriots picked C Jared Wilson in the third round, a smart choice that could help form a solid offensive line under head coach Mike Vrabel.
The Las Vegas Raiders chose RB Ashton Jeanty in the first round, a top-shelf pick that should strengthen their rushing attack.
The New York Jets selected OT Armand Membou in the first round, a move that should help form a rushing powerhouse for Justin Fields and Breece Hall.
The Las Vegas Raiders also drafted CB Shavon Revel Jr., a versatile player who could potentially stabilize their underperforming cornerback room.
The Indianapolis Colts picked RB DJ Giddens in the fifth round, a versatile player with the speed and agility required for success in their system.
The Cincinnati Bengals selected edge Shemar Stewart in the first round, a promising pick that could provide vital support for their offense.
The Denver Broncos drafted CB Jahdae Barron in the first round, a player with the potential to make immediate contributions to their secondary.

These sentences follow the given narrative of NFL teams grading their drafts and the players they selected. The sentences contain the keywords specified and discuss players from various positions like quarterback, coach, cornerback, and offensive line. They also mention game concepts like playoffs and highlight instances of trade and injuries. Additionally, some sentences discuss team strategy and their workload during the season.