Systematic Assault on Western Civilization: Disguised Hypocrisy Unveiled

Steaming Over the West

In the Western world, it's tough not to notice the growing sense of unease and confusion swirling around us. With calls of "betrayal," "bias," and "two-tier policing" becoming increasingly common, people are starting to wonder if there's more to it than just inconsistencies or failed leadership. Could there be something more insidious at play? Diving deeper might help reveal a far more deliberate and chilling truth.

Consider this example that hits close to home – Toronto, Canada:

A man dons a shirt supporting the Jewish Defensive League (JDL). Police confront him, demanding he either remove the shirt or turn it inside out so the text isn't visible.

Let's break this down, peeling back the first layer of distortion. According to traditional media outlets, a man backing Jewish people's rights in Toronto is forced to hide his support. Meanwhile, protesters waving flags, emblems, and banners for groups like Hizb'allah and Hamas – organizations known for their terrorist activities – roam free and shout genocidal chants without consequence.

So far, so normal. Right? But the real story buried beneath this argument of hypocrisy and double standards is something far more sinister.

Have you ever stopped to consider the last two decades in the West?

Imagine trying to legally immigrate to a Western country. The process is time-consuming, expensive, and riddled with obstacles, leaving aspiring immigrants vulnerable to deportation if they seek work or engage in any productive activity.

On the other hand, millions have flooded into these countries, seemingly with government encouragement. Local officials are often left in the dark by the sheer scale and speed of these migrations.

Take the grassroots protest in Ottawa against the construction of temporary shelters, or Sprung Structures, as they're called, to house illegals in a West End neighborhood. The project was done without consulting local residents, who were shocked to find their neighborhood overrun with no infrastructure to support it. In fact, the local city councilor, Wilson Lo, had to file a Freedom of Information Request just to get details about the plan!

This casual disregard for elected representatives when accommodating illegals isn't a one-off occurrence – it's part of a larger, orchestrated strategy that demands scrutiny.

The order to house large numbers of illegals came from the top, shielded from public view and local decision-makers.

It's become clear that protests are handled in a predictable pattern across the world. Policymakers respond harshly when citizens protest for their rights and freedoms guaranteed by law, punishing them either through the justice system or unofficial agents like ANTIFA or BLM. Meanwhile, self-proclaimed victims of these rights are given free rein to provoke public outrage without repercussions.

In effect, authorities are setting a trap. They provoke the people, then criminalize their response, tightening their grip on power. As the rule of law fades, a new, Hegelian/Marxist system of thought takes its place.

Our concept of justice and law has been ingrained in us since birth. We believe in a fair, orderly society where police protect our rights and personal safety. When we see law enforcement blatantly disregard these principles, we see it as hypocrisy or double standards.

However, we are witnessing a broader, calculated strategy that supersedes our conventional worldview.

We are experiencing a shift from the Rule of Law to a system where state-sanctioned actions are destructive and opposition to those actions will be met with punishment – even criminalization. Legislation like "hate speech laws" is a great example.

One clue to this calculated, deliberate attack on Western civilization lies in the consistency of these destructive actions. Laws are given names that appear to be grants but instead serve to criminalize opposition.

For example, the "Online Harms Act" in Canada is a disguise for criminalizing those who oppose government narratives. The fact that it's named "Anti-Conversion Therapy" law, meant to confuse and silence those who dare question its intentions, is a telling example of this strategy.

This attack on our Western civilization isn't something that could have been orchestrated by elected representatives alone. We needed fully controlled narrative-enforcement media, schools indoctrinating the youth, and ideological subversion to transform our entire system of thought.

As I sit here, Christmas Eve, it seems fitting to bring up an article from the New York Times (NYT):

There will, of course, be justified outrage over the NYT refusing to publish an article questioning whether Muhammad actually existed – especially during Ramadan. Many will cry hypocrisy.

This brings us to a related topic. In a recent interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, the lead actress of the political thriller Homeland revealed something notable. She revealed that, according to what she learned while preparing for her role, U.S. intelligence actively partners with journalists. However, before she could delve deeper, Colbert quickly changed the subject.

The point is that we are under attack on multiple fronts. Efforts to change Christmas markets to "Holiday markets" are simply just one more instance in a long line of attacks on our cultural identity. The fact that no similar restrictions are imposed on other faiths is not hypocrisy – it is a deliberate strategy. The term "inclusivity," for instance, is a tool used to silence objections to policies that, in irony, aim at excluding Western cultures.

In line with George Orwell's work, 1984:

"Freedom is slavery"*
"War is peace"*
"Ignorance is strength"*

We see similar doublespeak today:*

"Diversity is our strength"*
"Safety and efficacy"*
"Math is sexist"*
"Protect Trans kids"*
"Pandemic of the unvaccinated"*

And the list goes on and on.

The growing unease and confusion in the Western world, evident in discussions around freedom, truth, and politics, might reveal a more insidious truth about a deliberate strategy aimed at shifting the rule of law.
In light of the inconsistent treatment of protesters in Toronto, Canada, it's worth questioning whether science, art, general-news, and community discussions are influenced by such strategies, as authorities seem to criminalize opposition while allowing groups with dubious intentions to roam free.
As we reflect on the last two decades in the West, it's essential to examine the impact of immigration policies and measures like the Online Harms Act in Canada, which, under the guise of anti-discrimination laws, might be criminalizing dissenting voices, thus eroding our cherished principles of freedom and truth.