Skip to content

Swift executive orders amidst vague and uncertain direction, confuse contractors, leaving them uncertain about their obligations.

Contractors could be in the dark about the evaluation standards for spending programs, according to the President and CEO of the Professional Services Council, questioning the identity of those conducting the reviews.

Rapid issuance of executive orders and vague, incomplete guidance leaves contractors questioning...
Rapid issuance of executive orders and vague, incomplete guidance leaves contractors questioning their obligations

Swift executive orders amidst vague and uncertain direction, confuse contractors, leaving them uncertain about their obligations.

The federal government is grappling with a wave of confusion and uncertainty, particularly among contractors working with multiple agencies, due to a series of recent executive orders issued by the Trump administration.

David Berteau, President and CEO of the Professional Services Council, has expressed concern over the mixed and evolving guidance coming from various agencies at differing paces and levels of clarity. The orders, which cover spending on obligations and disbursements agency-by-agency and some that are governmentwide, have raised questions and caused confusion.

One of the areas affected by this confusion is federal contracting. Reports suggested that Army contracts were on hold due to a review of forthcoming contract solicitations aimed at removing diversity, equity, and inclusion language required by a Trump executive order. However, the Defense Department later clarified that Army contracts were not on hold.

Similarly, the General Services Administration (GSA) announced a pause for "new GSA-funded obligations," but the extent of this pause, whether it applies only to the GSA's own programs or extends to products and services provided to other agencies, remains unclear.

Despite the ever-shifting agency actions, Berteau stresses that only a written stop-work order issued by a cognizant contracting officer can legally affect a federal contract. This confusion, he believes, extends down to program managers and contracting officers as well.

The effects of these executive orders on government contractors remain unclear. A federal judge temporarily halted the order minutes before it was due to take effect, and the Office of Management and Budget rescinded the order on Wednesday. However, the uncertainty and confusion persist, with the orders not always being internally consistent and raising questions inside the agency.

As the situation continues to evolve, Berteau expects further clarification from the Defense Department and Army regarding their conflicting communications, and he is unaware of a comprehensive laydown of what every agency is doing or how they are doing it. The federal government's acquisition circles are left in a state of uncertainty, with contractors working with multiple agencies feeling the brunt of the confusion.

Read also:

Latest