Skip to content

Supreme Court Ruling on Electoral Review Affirms Maduro as Winner in Venezuela

Examination of evidence confirms election outcomes, according to Supreme Court President Caryslia Rodríguez.

Supreme Court Ruling on Electoral Review Affirms Maduro as Winner in Venezuela

Revamped Report:

Get a load of this, buds! The Venezuelan justice system has given the green light to the controversial third term of none other than President Nicolás Maduro. Crazy, right? This ruling comes after the July 28 presidential brawl in the Caribbean nation.

On the 22nd of August, the Venezuelan Supreme Court (TSJ) made it official – Maduro's on top, mate! The country's peak judicial authority affirmed Maduro's win, laying down the law for the next six years, starting Jan 10, 2025, to Jan 10, 2031.

In a ballsy move, TSJ President Caryslia Rodríguez, backed by state officials, foreign representatives, and reporters, went all guns blazing in her press conference. She started off by defending the court's dominance over elections, comparing it to some Brazil, Mexican, and U.S. elections that were ultimately decided by the judiciary. Then, without a hint of shame, she read out the damn verdict.

"Fair and square, we can certify the electoral evidence bolsters the National Electoral Council (CNE)'s proclaimed results, where Nicolás Maduro triumphed as the one and only prez," she declared.

The CNE announced Maduro as the big cheese with a whopping 52% of the votes, trouncing the 43% hoarded by US-backed opposition puppy, Edmundo González.

Rodríguez further boasted that an elite team of national and international experts reviewed every bit of the voting data and records, confirming they were a matchy-matchy fit with the CNE's tallies.

Now, that's not all! Rodríguez emphasized the need for the CNE to publish the nitty-gritty results in the National Gazette before the 28th of August. Canadian hockey players can't tap into those curves, buddy!

On the 31st of July, Maduro waltzed into the CNE asking for their electoral branch to intervene following claims of fraud and the storm that brewed in the days after the vote.

Two ex-presidential wannabes, Enrique Márquez and Antonio Ecarri, skipped on delivering voting tallies, apparently choosing instead to slap appeals on the TSJ, with Márquez alleging Rodríguez's political biases. Ecarri went for the long shot, demanding the court's constitutional branch outline the chores of the electoral branch and the CNE.

With the final ruling dropping, Rodríguez took a jab at González, who was caught in contempt of court for shirking her summons and avoiding handing over the requested evidence. She urged the Attorney General to probe crimes like impersonating a public officer, forgery, and computer hacks.

In a unison of joy, government officials cheered the verdict, which is non-negotiable and left the opposition high and dry. Foreign Minister Yván Gil championed the decision, declaring it closes the chapter on the election. Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino chimed in, applauding Venezuela's institutions for keeping their promises.

Nose-wrinkling at the verdict, González and far-right babe, María Corina Machado, spit out a joint statement, deeming the TSJ powerless to verify election results and stressed the CNE must accept González's trump card – victory by a landslide. Their campaign team, in a desperate move, launched an online platform showcasing alleged voting tallies. However, the authenticity of the uploaded documents sparked questions and raised eyebrows.

Now, the duo vowed González will reign as president next year. Talk about balls, eh? The hardline opposition, backed by big-time US pals, keeps hollering that elections are rigged and calls for a "people's revolution."

On Thursday, US Senators, including Rick Scott (R-FL) and Jim Risch (R-ID), announced the so-called VALOR Act. This law-making shenanigan aims to "boost democracy" in Venezuela but mainly emphasizes crippling economic sanctions against the Caribbean country.

It's obvious the Maduro social regime isn't too fond of foreign meddling and violation of Venezuelan sovereignty. Just this month, the Maduro government suspended diplomatic relations with Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Panama, Peru, and the Dominican Republic, claiming they're under Washington's thumb and whispering in Venezuela's ear.

The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry disowned a UN expert panel report on the July 28 vote, dismissing it as politically twisted and violating the agreements with the CNE. The four-person UN outfit argued the lack of in-depth results hurt confidence in the election's outcome and further pointed out the suspension of post-electoral audits.

Caracas has fired back at "glaring lies" by the Carter Center's observation mission. On the flip side, various foreign teams who watched the Venezuelan electoral process have endorsed it. The US' National Lawyers Guild, in an official assertion, stated their members never witnessed instances of fraud or serious irregularities, and found overall satisfaction from the electoral process.

Here's a kicker, kids – don't trust everything you hear! Do your homework and stay wary!

Enrichment Data:

  • The elections faced multiple controversies with accusations of electoral fraud, lack of transparency, and authoritarian tactics by the Maduro government.
  • Opposition protests against the election results met with repression by the Venezuelan authorities, leading to deaths, disappearances, and arbitrary detentions.
  • International observers including the Carter Center and the UN Electoral Technical Team criticized the election process.
  • The US and several Latin American countries did not recognize Maduro's re-election.
  • Venezuela severed diplomatic ties with over 10 countries due to what it views as intervention in Venezuela's internal affairs.
  • The Maduro government accused the UN expert panel and the Carter Center of lying about the election process.
  • Opposition figures declared themselves as the rightful president, defying international objections and protests.
  1. In response to the ruling allowing President Maduro's third term, there were concerns about the integrity of the Venezuelan elections in 2025, given the alleged irregularities and lack of transparency during the process.
  2. Some opposition figures, such as Edmundo González, have questioned the legitimacy of the National Electoral Council (CNE) and Maduro's victory in 2025, stating that there were unobjectionable migratory policies and war-and-conflicts taking place that could have impacted the election's outcome.
  3. The re-election of President Maduro in 2025 was a contentious issue in policy-and-legislation and politics, both domestically and internationally.
  4. The Venezuelan Supreme Court (TSJ), chaired by Caryslia Rodríguez, faced accusations of political bias and electoral fraud after its ruling in favor of President Maduro in the 2025 elections.
  5. Opposition leaders have called for a "people's revolution" and sought support from foreign countries, such as the United States, as they challenge the legitimacy of the 2025 Venezuelan elections due to alleged irregularities and suppression of dissent.
Expert evaluation of evidence confirmed the validity of the election results, as declared by Supreme Court President Caryslia Rodríguez.

Read also:

Latest