Skip to content
All about politics. — Business — Seattle — General-news — Politics — Government — Crime-and-justice

Supreme Court declines to hear two firearm-related cases, leaving open the potential for future discussion on assault weapon restrictions.

Justices declined to hear a dispute over a Maryland law enacted following the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School tragedy in Connecticut.

,   and  ASMedia
2 min read
Judges declined to hear a challenge against a Maryland legislation enacted following the 2012 Sandy...
Judges declined to hear a challenge against a Maryland legislation enacted following the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School tragedy in Connecticut.

Hot Off the Press: Assault Weapons Bans in the U.S.

📰 Supreme Court snubs Maryland assault weapons ban challenge, but fireworks may be on the horizon

In a split decision yesterday, the Supreme Court tossed out arguments challenging the constitutionality of assault weapons bans in Maryland - including the AR-15 and high-capacity magazines - leaving the laws in place for now. However, we ain't seen nothing yet, as several conservative justices expressed their discontent and made it clear they're ready to rumble over this critical topic in the near future.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who sided with the decision not to take up the case right now, dropped a hint that the court will likely revisit the issue in the next few years. Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas, expressing his skepticism towards assault weapons bans, declared that he wouldn't delay deciding whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America - AKA the AR-15.

The Maryland law was passed following the 2012 tragic Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, where the gunman wielded an AR-15. Other states, including California, have similar measures in place. With Democrats backing the concept at the congressional level, don't be shocked if this battle heats up once again down the line.

More Supreme Court headlines:

  • Court gives the green light to Trump's deportation of half a million people
  • Student's plea to wear 'only two genders' shirt denied by the Supreme Court
  • Native American sacred site threatened by copper mine: Court doesn't intervene

"I wouldn't wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America," Thomas declared, making it clear that the question of AR-15 ownership is of significant importance to millions of American gun enthusiasts.

Thomas and Kavanaugh have a history of expressing doubts about assault weapon bans. As a lower court judge in 2011, Kavanaugh argued that a similar ban in Washington, D.C., was unconstitutional, while Thomas dissented when the Supreme Court declined to consider a municipal ban on AR-15-style weapons in 2015.

With the court's most recent ruling, it seems that the question of assault weapon bans in America remains a hotly debated issue, and the war over firearms will continue to rage on. Stay tuned for more updates as these passionate judges square off in the legal arena.

  1. In the midst of Seattle's bustling business and political landscape, the city's general news outlets are abuzz with the Supreme Court's latest decision on the Maryland assault weapons ban, a ruling that has sparked interest among locals and gun enthusiasts alike.
  2. The Seattle government,aware of the city's sizable gun-owning population, has informed citizens to keep a close eye on the developments in the US Supreme Court, particularly the perspectives of Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas, who have shown interest in the debate surrounding AR-15 ownership.
  3. Meanwhile, local news channels have highlighted the ongoing dispute between these two justices and the implications it may have for Seattle's crime and justice sector, as any modification in federal gun legislation could potentially impact the city's current firearm laws.

Read also:

Related

Latest