Stubborn adherence to a catastrophic misstep by Mützenich
Title: "Manifest" of SPD Leftists: Mützenich Stands Firm on Fatal Misconception of Peace
Contribution From Thomas Schmoll
It's evident that the peace-loving faction of the Social Democrats (SPD) remains stuck in the past with their latest "manifest" publication. This crowd fails to grasp the brutal reality that power-hungry tyrants like Putin won't hesitate to take what they want, using military force whenever necessary. And the only effective countermeasure is a strong, firm response.
Mützenich, a seasoned politician, has been dealing with some crushing defeats recently, both on a personal and political level. The SPD scored its worst federal election result to date with 16.4 percent. Following this dismal performance, almost every Social Democrat voted for Friedrich Merz to become Chancellor, the same man whom Mützenich had branded as the "gatekeeper to hell" for allying with the AfD. Mützenich then suffered a demotion from party leader to congressional nobody, while Lars Klingbeil, the new SPD leader, was appointed Minister of Finance. More recently, the chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the Bundestag was snatched away from Mützenich by CDU colleague Armin Laschet.
Politics: "Surrender to the Sword" - SPD Politicians Urge a U-turn in Foreign Policy and Dialogue with Russia
Mützenich maintains that diplomatic and prudent foreign policies should not solely rely on military themes and objectives. However, he disregards the fact that the foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany during the era after the fall of the Berlin Wall, thankfully, was far from being dominated entirely by armament and militarism - and it isn't today. If anyone is responsible for making "military themes and objectives" a mainstay in German politics, it's Russia. And yet, there are still individuals like Mützenich, stubbornly clinging to the past.
Mützenich, along with some other leading SPD pacifists from the left, has authored a security and foreign policy policy paper. Their document aligns them with Putin apologists and enablers, despite their efforts to conceal it more subtly than the likes of Sahra Wagenknecht and her colleagues. "Military alarmism" - so the justification of Mützenich and his comrades, such as Ralf Stegner, who consistently inflame panic about nuclear war - "and explosive rearmament programs do not offer more security for Germany and Europe, but instead cause destabilization and heightened mutual sense of threat between NATO and Russia."
Politics: Roth Speaks Out Against SPD's Pacifism Manifesto "Not a Substantive Argument, Just Historical Revisionism"
You'd assume that the authors of this debate contribution would pay heed to the news. But it seems that Mützenich and his cronies are bothered, perhaps even hurt, by the success that Merz, as Chancellor, has managed to achieve in a brief period. Merz managed to momentarily halt Russia's attack on Ukraine through a ceasefire and other diplomatic means that Madame Chancellor Scholz couldn't achieve in three years. The only interaction Scholz had with Putin amounts to nothing, considering what we know about it.
Politics: Stegner Defends SPD Paper "So What's the Problem with Advocating for Peace?"
Scholz, the SPD's Chancellor, had become overly reliant on the actions of the former U.S. President Joe Biden. Unfortunately, it resulted in Germany being largely isolated in Europe and losing credibility. But all of this progress is undermined by the "manifesto" of naive, misinformed SPD pacifists. They seem unfazed by the fact that the Social Democrats are part of the government, and Klingbeil is none other than the Minister of Finance. It's astonishing that Mützenich and Stegner would rather persist with business as usual to counteract the SPD's catastrophic plunge in popularity, rather than adapting to the current political climate.
Shots Unheard in Ukraine
Mützenich, Stegner, and their fellow Putin-sympathizers within the SPD cling to their outdated thought patterns, continuing to pine for a nuclear-free world where everyone lives harmoniously, as if Russia never invaded Ukraine. Putin is the warmonger, a warlord who allocates vast sums to armament, recruits soldiers from North Korea, aims for an empire at least as large as the Soviet Union, provokes NATO, and consistently threatens with nuclear weapons. Russia relentlessly bombs civilian targets in Ukraine day and night and has shown no inclination to engage in negotiations aimed at achieving a lasting peace or compensation for the invaded country. Yet Stegner opts to voice concerns about an imminent land war and conscription.
Politics: 60,000 More Soldiers? But from Where? An Expert Explains Why Conscription is not the Solution
Stegner has failed to hear the gunfire in Ukraine. Instead of examining how the SPD contributed to driving Germany into Russian energy dependency or traveling to the front to witness the devastation firsthand, he exchanges ideas with Putin apologists in Baku. Whether Stegner is naive, foolish, reckless, or overconfident is up for debate. In any case, he belongs to the ranks of SPD members who consistently undermine official foreign policy to Russia's advantage. Isolation of the Kremlin, not courtship, should be the objective. Appeasement leads to danger.
The SPD remains adamant in clinging to "change through trade" under Klingbeil's leadership. No one is threatening Russia right now, and no one is considering it. But it's high time that even the pacifists understand: Peace requires the participation of both parties, with one country representing war at the moment. Mützenich made heads turn when he expressed his fervent hope last year in the Bundestag that we might not only discuss the waging of war but also consider how to freeze a war and eventually bring it to a halt. Even asking the question didn't help.
Early Start: Fiedler in ntv Early Start - SPD Paper Criticized by SPD Colleagues
Mützenich abhors war. In 1991, he completed his doctoral thesis on "Nuclear-Weapons-Free Zones and International Politics - Historical Experiences, Framework Conditions, Perspectives." It is commendable that Mützenich supports arms delivery to Ukraine. But what he still can't comprehend is that ruthless strongmen like Putin will seize power using their military forces, and the most effective countermeasure is a strong response. And this failure to grasp the truth could have grave consequences - not just for Germany.
Source: ntv.de
- SPD
- Rolf Mützenich
- Ralf Stegner
- Vladimir Putin
- Attack on Ukraine
- The European Union, with its nuclear programs, has a responsibility to respond strongly to the aggression in Ukraine, especially considering the ongoing attack by Vladimir Putin's forces, instead of clinging to outdated notions of pacifism as some SPD politicians like Rolf Mützenich and Ralf Stegner have been advocating.
- In the midst of Putin's continued military action in Ukraine, it is imperative for the European Union, including the SPD and its leaders like Mützenich and Stegner, to understand that diplomacy and dialogue, while important, may not be sufficient in the face of a warlord who shows no signs of stopping his expansionist ambitions and relentless bombing of civilian targets.
