"Cutting Corners" Merz Slammed Over Social Sector Funding Review by SPD
- By Florian Schillat
- 🕒 Min Read: 2
Unbearable, Unacceptable, Unendurable: These are the words that describe this situation. - SPD criticizes Merz for social spending cuts, calling them burdensome
The SPD parliamentary group is biting back at Chancellor Friedrich Merz for his criticism of social spending. "It's downright disgraceful how Merz is attempting to pit disabled individuals, children in tough situations, and the general public against each other," said the SPD's deputy parliamentary group leader, Dagmar Schmidt, to stern.
Merz, heading the CDU, announced at the German Cities and Municipalities Association's Kommunalkongress in Berlin that a thorough review of spending in social law would be necessary. He stated that annual increases of up to 10% in youth welfare and integration support over the years are no longer acceptable. On Wednesday, Merz mentioned plans to ensure support for those genuinely in need while also considering the budget's performance capacity.
SPD's Schmidt: "Blasé Disregard for the Social State"
"The social state isn't a budgetary expense that can be adjusted according to cash flow," countered Schmidt, who oversees work, social affairs, education, and family, among other matters. The social state underpins social unity. Particularly children and youth require protection and assistance, said Schmidt.
Those who lament the growing costs of integration support and youth welfare without addressing underlying factors, such as escalating personnel and material costs and a surge in recipients, display "a troublingly austere understanding of the social state."
Merz guaranteed cities and municipalities that federal funds would be disbursed more efficiently - citing the ability to make on-site decisions about project allocation. However, he added that it would be crucial to reassess the extent to which funds could still be provided. "If every project receives funding at once, it's almost as if nothing is getting funded." Funds should be concentrated where there is a discernible added value for citizens.
"Instead of questioning funding universally, Merz should champion stronger family support, more prevention strategies, and a solidarity-based funding model for our social system," demanded Schmidt. Those who view the social state solely in terms of savings opportunities "fail to grasp the social challenges of our time."
- SPD
- Friedrich Merz
- Dagmar Schmidt
- Budgetary Cuts
- CDU
- Children
- Coalition
- Berlin
Background:
While the SPD has historically favored infrastructural investments, they generally oppose substantial cuts to social spending. Their response to Merz's specific budget review proposals in the social and municipal sectors is yet to be fully elaborated as the CDU and SPD have had contrasting fiscal priorities during coalition negotiations[5]. Merz's administration has advocated for reforms including reduced corporate tax rates and infrastructure investments[1][4]. There is criticism over whether these measures sufficiently address structural economic issues or guarantee long-term economic stability[4].
Sources:1. Die Zeit2. Der Spiegel3. tagesschau.de4. Handelsblatt5. Deutschlandfunk
- The Commission, in light of the SPD's criticism on social spending, may be asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of the environment, as a policy-and-legislation response to Merz's focus on budgetary cuts, particularly in the social sector.
- Amidst political disagreements over social spending and budgetary cuts, the ongoing coalition negotiations between the CDU and SPD, including Merz's administration and Dagmar Schmidt, present general news significance due to their potential impact on the social state, children, and the overall environment.
