Smart Glasses Spark Privacy Battles in U.S. Courtrooms Amid Rising Tech Threats
Smart glasses are raising fresh concerns in courtrooms across the United States. These wearable devices, capable of discreetly recording audio and video, have already led to bans in some states. The issue gained attention after a judge recently warned Meta employees against using their Ray-Ban smart glasses during a trial.
Meta, the company behind the popular iCloud service, has sold over seven million pairs of its smart glasses since 2025, with two distinct models now available. The standard version includes a camera, microphone, and speakers, while a newer US model adds a mini-display in the right lens for showing notifications and data. As tech giants like Apple prepare to enter the market, the legal system faces growing challenges in maintaining privacy and security.
Federal courts have long prohibited recordings of criminal trials since 1946 and civil proceedings since 1972. These rules aim to protect fair trials by preventing outside influence on witnesses or jurors. But smart glasses, which can capture footage without obvious signs, make enforcement far harder.
States like Hawaii and Wisconsin have already banned the devices in courtrooms over fears of privacy breaches and security risks. The concerns deepened when Judge Carolyn Kuhl directly addressed Meta staff wearing Ray-Ban smart glasses in her Los Angeles courtroom. She explicitly warned them against recording, highlighting the potential for misuse.
The problem may worsen as future models introduce even more intrusive features. Facial recognition technology, for example, could further complicate privacy protections. With smart glasses becoming more advanced and widespread, courts are struggling to keep up with the rapid pace of innovation.
Meta's success in the market—selling millions of units—shows how quickly these devices are gaining popularity. Other major companies, including Apple, are now developing their own versions. This surge in adoption means courts will likely face increasing pressure to adapt their policies or risk compromising sensitive legal proceedings.
The legal system now confronts a difficult balancing act. Smart glasses offer new conveniences but also pose serious threats to courtroom confidentiality. Without stricter controls or updated regulations, the risk of unauthorised recordings and privacy violations will only grow. States and federal courts must decide how to address these challenges as the technology spreads.
