Sisters of soccer legend Diego Maradona accused of trademark infringement in court proceedings
In a shocking turn of events, the trial regarding the care and management of the late football legend Diego Maradona's estate has been reopened. This decision comes approximately two and a half months after the initial trial, which was declared null and void due to a scandal involving a responsible judge.
The ongoing legal action involves allegations of financial misconduct and potential financial losses in the millions. Six people, including Maradona's former lawyer Matías Morla and his sisters Rita and Claudia, have been accused of fraud. The specific details of the financial misconduct and losses are not specified, but the allegations are severe enough to warrant a court case.
The prosecution is accusing the responsible medical staff of gross negligence in Maradona's care, which may have contributed to his untimely death in November 2020 at the age of 60 from heart failure, just a few weeks after surgery for a blood clot in his brain.
The lawsuit also involves the illegal appropriation of Maradona's name for commercial purposes. The six defendants, including Maradona's sisters and his former lawyer, are accused of using the iconic footballer's brand name for their own financial gain.
Interestingly, neither Matias Morla nor Maradona's sisters Rita and Claudia were appointed as heirs to Maradona's estate. After his death, his entire estate was transferred to his children.
In a preventive measure, the court has seized a total of 12 billion pesos (6.9 million euros) from the six defendants. The case now includes businesses of a company managing trademark rights.
The children of Maradona have filed a lawsuit against the defendants, accusing them of fraud. The repercussions of this case are significant, not only for the Maradona family but also for the football world, as the legacy of one of the greatest players of all time is at stake.
As the trial progresses, more details are expected to emerge, shedding light on the intricate web of events that led to this legal battle. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to managing the estates of public figures.
