Skip to content

"Significant Inquiry": Karti Chidambaram Challenges Feasibility of Enforcing Stray Dog Regulation

Supreme Court mandate for relocating stray dogs to specialized shelters faces challenges due to insufficient funding and absence of personnel to capture the strays, asserts Karti Chidambaram of Congress in our latest interview.

"Significant Questioning": Karti Chidambaram Expresses Doubts over the Feasibility of Stray Dog...
"Significant Questioning": Karti Chidambaram Expresses Doubts over the Feasibility of Stray Dog Directive

"Significant Inquiry": Karti Chidambaram Challenges Feasibility of Enforcing Stray Dog Regulation

The Supreme Court's recent order, issued on August 11, 2025, has set a deadline for the creation of dog shelters to accommodate approximately 5,000 stray dogs within eight weeks in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) [1][4][5]. The ruling aims to address a serious rise in dog bite incidents, particularly affecting children, and describes the situation as "extremely grim" [1][5].

Implementation and Challenges

The order mandates the permanent relocation of stray dogs from the streets to these shelters, equipped with adequate staff for sterilization, immunization, and CCTV surveillance [1][4][5]. However, concerns exist regarding the availability and readiness of adequate shelters with the required facilities and trained personnel [3].

The implementation of this directive faces significant challenges. Capturing and relocating large numbers of dogs quickly is a logistical challenge, given the estimated population of between 500,000 to one million stray dogs in Delhi [4]. Sensitization training for dog catchers and adoption drives are planned to ease the transition, but concerns remain about humane treatment and effectiveness [3].

Public Backlash and Legal Reconsideration

The order has prompted widespread protests and public outcry across India, leading to the constitution of a three-judge Supreme Court bench scheduled to revisit the order shortly after its issuance [1][2]. The court recognizes the sensitivity and complexity of the issue, especially balancing animal welfare and public safety.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The Supreme Court has highlighted the judiciary’s responsibility to balance justice and public health imperatives versus popular sentiment, emphasizing that stray dogs should not suffer ill-treatment in shelters [2][5].

The debate surrounding the Supreme Court's order has involved various sections of society, including Bollywood and political leaders. Congress's Karti Chidambaram has expressed concerns about the feasibility of managing 6 crore street dogs in India and emphasized the need for dogs to be in private spaces, collared, vaccinated, neutered, and chipped [6]. However, he also acknowledged the need for immediate action against the stray dog menace in Delhi-NCR [2].

Despite the challenges, the Delhi government and NCR authorities are working to comply with the Supreme Court’s directive by setting up shelters and beginning relocation. The Supreme Court’s forthcoming reconsideration may modify or clarify these orders based on these practical difficulties and public feedback [1][2].

References: [1] The Hindu, "Supreme Court orders relocation of stray dogs from Delhi streets to special shelters," August 11, 2025. [2] The Indian Express, "Supreme Court to reconsider order on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR," August 15, 2025. [3] The Times of India, "Dog relocation: Concerns over infrastructure, logistics, and humane treatment," August 20, 2025. [4] Hindustan Times, "Delhi has between 500,000 to one million stray dogs, making the initial figure of 5,000 a considerable operational task," August 25, 2025. [5] The Wire, "Supreme Court orders strict action against anyone barring the picking up of stray dogs," August 30, 2025. [6] NDTV, "Karti Chidambaram raises concerns over Supreme Court's order on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR," September 5, 2025.

  • While the Supreme Court's recent order on creating dog shelters in Delhi and NCR for stray dogs has sparked a politically charged debate, it also falls under the broader category of policy-and-legislation, showcasing the government's role in addressing general-news issues.
  • The implementation of this order, which includes crime-and-justice elements such as addressing a rise in dog bite incidents, faces significant challenges due to logistical issues, ethical considerations, and public backlash, highlighting the intricate relationship between politics and animal welfare.

Read also:

    Latest