Senator Grassley Proposes Bipartisan Legislation to Restrict Trump's Authority Over Tariffs
In the midst of a global economic turbulence, the Trade Review Act of 2025, proposed by Senators Chuck Grassley and Maria Cantwell, seems to have a questionable status. The Act, designed to reassert Congress's constitutional role in trade policy, aims to require the President to notify Congress of new tariffs within 48 hours and obtain Congress's approval within 60 days.
However, recent searches have not yielded any verifiable information on the Act's progress, leaving its current status unclear. The focus remains on tariff-related executive actions, such as President Trump's announcement of a worldwide baseline tariff of 10% on most countries, and his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to enact global tariffs.
These tariff actions, which include reciprocal tariffs and fentanyl-related tariffs, have been subject to court challenges, modifications, and administrative stays throughout 2025. The modifications have affected tariffs on countries like Canada, China, and Mexico, in response to trade and national security concerns.
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to levy tariffs. Yet, without evidence from congressional records or authoritative legislative tracking, the status of the Trade Review Act of 2025 cannot be confirmed, nor can its prospects for becoming law be assessed.
Meanwhile, the global economy continues to struggle, with leaders such as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen expressing concern over Trump's tariff moves. Carney stated that the 80-year period of U.S. global economic leadership is over, while von der Leyen criticised Trump's tariff announcement, stating it would have a major negative impact on the world economy.
Domestically, Vice President JD Vance maintains that Trump's policies would not cause inflation to spike again, while Kamala Harris specifically warned about Trump implementing a national sales tax of at least 20% on everyday goods and necessities.
Amidst these debates, it appears that the Trade Review Act of 2025 either has not been introduced, has not gained traction, or is not publicly reported as active legislation at this time. The future of trade policy in the United States remains uncertain, with the focus squarely on the ongoing tariff disputes and their potential impact on the global economy.
[1] Source 1 [2] Source 2 [3] Source 3 [4] Source 4 [5] Source 5
- Gizmodo, in its technology section, might report on the uncertain future of the Trade Review Act of 2025, a legislation proposal designed to reassert Congress's role in trade policy, given its unclear progress and the ongoing focus on tariff-related executive actions.
- Given the lack of verifiable information on the Trade Review Act of 2025, tech enthusiasts pursuing general news might find themselves scouring policy-and-legislation forums and sites for updates on the bill's status and prospects.
- A political analyst might use the stagnation of the Trade Review Act of 2025 as an example of the complex relationship between technology (tariff actions) and politics, highlighting how tech developments can impact policy-and-legislation and vice versa.
