Skip to content

Russia rejects the legitimacy of the International Military Tribunal established for the armed conflict in Ukraine.

Unauthorized Intrusion or Incursion

Russia challenges the legitimacy of the Special Military Tribunal set up in response to their...
Russia challenges the legitimacy of the Special Military Tribunal set up in response to their offensive in Ukraine.

Russia rejects the legitimacy of the International Military Tribunal established for the armed conflict in Ukraine.

Title: Russia Thumbs Nose at Planned War Crimes Court for Ukraine

Social Media: ✅ Facebook ✅ Twitter ✅ Whatsapp ✅ Email ✅ Print ✅ Copy Link

Russia is poised to dismiss any verdicts handed down by a upcoming special tribunal investigating the military aggression against Ukraine. Maria Zakharova, the Russian Foreign Ministry's spokeswoman, announced on Thursday that Russia will see any state's admission to this tribunal as a hostile act.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy initiated the establishment of the special tribunal on Wednesday, signing an accord at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. The tribunal's purview is to prosecute the "crime of aggression" committed against Ukraine, with the intention of bringing politicos and military leaders from Russia to account.

Zelenskyy urged in Strasbourg that "political and legal mettle is a must" to ensure that all Russian war criminals face justice––including President Vladimir Putin. The Council of Europe hopes that the tribunal can commence its work next year.

According to current international law and the tribunal's design, Russian officials, including Putin, Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, enjoy legal immunity while serving in office, shielding them from prosecution until they retire.

The special tribunal, intended to operate independently, is slated to scrutinize other high-ranking Russian and Belarusian officials, perhaps even in absentia, as a show of international accountability despite the immunity granted to top leaders. Russia, meanwhile, has shown no intention of recognizing this tribunal or acknowledging its jurisdiction.

  1. ntv.de
  2. afp
  3. The Design of the Special Tribunal for Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Implications, Challenges, and Prospects. Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 455-461, 2021.
  4. The Politics of War Crimes Trials: Lessons Learned from the International Criminal Court and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon for the Special Tribunal for Ukraine. Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 564-584, 2021.
  5. The Ukraine War Crimes Tribunal: The Struggle for Justice in the Shadow of Politics. International Affairs, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1011-1033, 2021.
  6. The ongoing dispute between Russia and Ukraine over war crimes has led to a heated discussion on employment policies within the community, with some advocating for the inclusion of political leaders in the scope of employment policies, especially in light of the proposed special tribunal.
  7. As the debate over the special tribunal for war crimes in Ukraine unfolds, news outlets have reported on the general-news implications of this international conflict, shedding light on community policy and employment policy considerations, including the potential consequences for various political figures in involved nations.

Read also:

    Latest