In a recent decision, the Rottweil Regional Court dismissed a lawsuit accusing a COVID-19 vaccine of causing harm, citing a lack of substantial evidence and questionable sources. The 58-year-old plaintiff sought 150,000 euros for vision issues and other health problems they attributed to the vaccine.
The court's verdict was not an endorsement of the vaccine's safety but a critique of the plaintiff's case. The justices called out relying on unsubstantiated reports, internet opinions, and non-scientific doctor's testimonies, while acknowledging the manufacturer's instructions stating possible, unspecified side effects.
Now, the plaintiff has a month to appeal at the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court. However, this task seems challenging in light of the court's strict evaluation of the original lawsuit.
German law doesn't explicitly assign liability for side effects from coronavirus vaccines. Instead, it falls under general tort law and product liability principles. Vaccine manufacturers could be held responsible for defects or inadequate warnings about potential side effects. Cases are examined individually based on medical evidence, negligence, and pre-existing conditions.
While vaccinations remain voluntary in Germany, there might be exceptions for high-risk occupations. The German labour courts will shape these issues as they navigate through future cases.
