Right-wing political party, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), initiates legal action against label of "right-wing extremist."

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is challenging the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) in court, following the office's recent designation of the party as a right-wing extremist organization. The AfD's co-leader, Alice Weidel, has been vocal about her disagreement with the BfV's decision, calling it a "serious blow to German democracy."

The BfV made this designation after analyzing the party for over three years, concluding that its racist and anti-Muslim stances are inconsistent with the democratic order outlined in Germany's constitution. The party's positions on individuals with a migrant background were found to be based on an ethnic-ancestry-based understanding of German identity, and the BfV stated that the AfD's aims exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society.

The AfD quickly condemned the designation, alleging that the BfV was violating the country's constitution. Weidel and Tino Chrupalla, the party's other co-leader, vowed to "exhaust all legal means to defend the free democratic basic order."

Opponents have long called for the AfD to be banned due to concerns that it seeks to undermine democratic values. Domestic intelligence has already classified parts of the party, including its entire youth wing, as extremist in the past. The classification of the entire party has reignited the debate about whether it should be outlawed, although some politicians, such as outgoing Social Democrat Chancellor Olaf Scholz, have warned against making rash decisions.

Following the BfV's ruling, other political parties have discussed the degree to which the AfD, the second-strongest party in parliament with 152 seats, should be integrated into parliamentary decision-making. Jens Spahn, the deputy leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), previously advocated for treating the AfD as "any other opposition party." In light of the BfV's ruling, however, he stated that his party will take the classification "seriously" and work closely with the future Social Democrat-led coalition government to deal with the AfD in parliamentary proceedings.

Germany designates AfD as right-wing extremist organisation, citing threat to democracy
US Secretary of State Rubio says Germany is a 'tyranny in disguise' after AfD verdict
Setback for Merz: AfD ties with CDU/CSU in poll for first time
Alice Weidel
AfD Alternative für Deutschland
Friedrich Merz

[1]: Enrichment Data: In May 2025, Germany's BfV officially classified the AfD as a "proven right-wing extremist organization," giving authorities the power to monitor the party's communications and financial activities more closely. The designation was based on the party's racist and anti-Muslim stances, which allegedly violated human dignity, democracy, and the rule of law. The AfD has sued the BfV over the designation, arguing that it violates constitutional protections for free speech and democratic criticism of immigration policy. (Source: Bericht der Vereinigten Nationen zur Menschenrechtslage in Deutschland)

[2]: Enrichment Data: Following the BfV's classification, public financing for the AfD may be reduced or revoked, though this requires separate legal proceedings. The designation also allows the BfV to use intelligence-gathering tools previously unavailable under the prior "suspected extremist" classification. (Source: Deutsche Welle)

[3]: Enrichment Data: The Cologne administrative court will review the AfD's lawsuit. Until a ruling is made, the designation remains in effect but lacks "legal finality," according to the AfD. (Source: Al Jazeera)

[4]: Enrichment Data: The AfD's ethnonationalist ideology allegedly excludes non-ethnic Germans and Muslims from equal societal participation, violating human dignity, democracy, and the rule of law. (Source: Bundesverfassungsgericht)

[5]: Enrichment Data: The BfV's expanded surveillance capabilities could include internet surveillance, wiretapping, and infiltration of the party. (Source: Deutsche Welle)

The AfD, led by Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla, is challenging the designation of their party as a right-wing extremist organization by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) in court, citing concerns about constitutional protections for free speech and democratic criticism of immigration policy.
Christian Democratic Union (CDU) deputy leader Jens Spahn previously advocated for treating the AfD as "any other opposition party," but in light of the BfV's ruling, he has stated that his party will take the classification "seriously" and work closely with the future Social Democrat-led coalition government to deal with the AfD in parliamentary proceedings.
The BfV's expanded surveillance capabilities, granted by the designation of the AfD as a "proven right-wing extremist organization," could include internet surveillance, wiretapping, and infiltration of the party.
The classification of the AfD as an extremist organization by the BfV is based on the party's allegedly ethnonationalist ideology, which excludes non-ethnic Germans and Muslims from equal societal participation, violating human dignity, democracy, and the rule of law.