Amidst the holiday season chill, coughs and sneezes fill waiting rooms across Germany. According to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), around 7.9 million people are currently grappling with respiratory infections. But how many of these cases are linked to coronavirus?
During the pandemic years, testing for coronavirus was widespread, whether at home, in medical practices, or test centers. Sore throats, runny noses, and fevers could be due to a simple cold, or the dreaded coronavirus. Positive rapid tests required verification with a PCR test, and practices reported the cases to the RKI. This approach provided the RKI with a clear picture of the number of coronavirus infections.
With the current 7-day incidence standing at 38, it might appear that nearly no one in Germany is currently dealing with Covid-19 (as of December 15, 2023). However, the situation is not so straightforward.
Coronavirus testing is no longer a universal practice. Now, individuals can voluntarily undergo a test at home, while hospitals only test symptomatic patients systematically. Since testing is no longer mandatory, the RKI can no longer directly compare the 7-day incidence of today with that from 2022. To accurately assess the current coronavirus situation, the RKI employs alternative methods, such as leveraging data from flu web participants and the SentiSurv study conducted by Mainz University Medical Center.
To better understand the coronavirus situation, the RKI also analyzes wastewater monitoring data. The viral load, at an average of almost one million gene copies in one liter of water, has reached its highest level since the RKI began tracking in June 2022. Heightened viral load trends since the end of June 2023 indicate a developing situation.
But what does wastewater monitoring data truly represent? The RKI receives information from 82 wastewater treatment plants across Germany, though these are not selected to be representative. Infected individuals excrete the pathogen via feces, urine, or saliva. Taking samples from wastewater from these treatment plants allows scientists to examine the viral load per liter of water. Using PCR tests, researchers can identify the presence of coronavirus in the wastewater. Monitoring coronavirus in water is an additional tool to more effectively assess the coronavirus situation. However, this data cannot determine the exact number of infected individuals, as individuals may excrete varying amounts of the virus depending on the severity or duration of their infection.
In conclusion, as Germany navigates ongoing respiratory infections, the RKI relies on alternative methods to monitor coronavirus trends, including wastewater monitoring. The viral load in wastewater has hit its highest level since June 2022, which suggests increasing trends.
Further Reading:
Source:
Enrichment Data:
- Early Detection: Wastewater surveillance offers a unique advantage of detecting viral spread in communities earlier than clinical testing, especially before patients exhibit symptoms or seek medical attention.
- Community-Level Perspective: Wastewater data provides a community-level perspective, uncovering local diseases, which can be particularly useful in regions where patients might not have access to testing facilities.
- Correlation with Clinical Cases: Research reveals a strong correlation between wastewater viral activity levels (WVAL) and clinical case counts, reinforcing wastewater's role as an epidemiological monitoring tool.
- Comparative Analysis: The WVAL metric enables regional comparison of infection patterns, facilitating evidence-based decision-making for public health purposes.
- Limitations and Variability: While wastewater monitoring is an effective way to track coronavirus trends, it has limitations. These include variations in detection methods, and sampling and storage factors impacting results.
- Global Implementation: Numerous countries employ wastewater surveillance, but the methodologies vary, with some countries using pseudo-aggregation techniques, while others, like the CDC, rely on standardized metrics like WVAL.
[1] Stephen M. Clifford, Brian V. D. Tang, "Wastewater-based epidemiology: assessment, potential, and challenges," State of the Art Reviews in Microbiology, 2020, 110:102083, ISSN 1369-5199, . [2] Kluytmans, J. et al. (2013) Risk assessment on human health associated with the presence of pathogens in wastewater. Water Research,85: 105–116. [3] Puredue, J.L. et al. (2021) Review and analysis of wastewater-based epidemiology. Journal of Environmental Sanitation, 162: 231-253.
