Skip to content

Rachel intends legal action against Roman Abramovich for withheld sale earnings from Chelsea Football Club.

Unsanctioned Russian tycoon's sale earnings of Chelsea FC, totaling £2.5 billion, designated for Ukraine assistance, are still stored in a British banking account.

Sanctioned Russian oligarch's £2.5bn earnings from selling Chelsea FC supposedly intended for...
Sanctioned Russian oligarch's £2.5bn earnings from selling Chelsea FC supposedly intended for Ukraine, yet remain in a British bank account.

In a notable turn of events, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have declared their intent to drag Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich, into court to seize the profits of his sale of Chelsea Football Club. This controversy stems from the sale, worth £2.5bn, in 2022, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

With the funds currently parked in a frozen UK bank account, they're intended for humanitarian causes supporting the Ukraine conflict. The government has expressed its frustration over the ongoing impasse with Abramovich, announcing that legal proceedings will commence if an agreement isn't reached shortly.

In a joint statement, the pair asserted, "We're determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. We're deeply frustrated that it hasn't been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far." They continue, assuring interested parties that while the door for diplomacy remains ajar, they stand ready to resort to the courts if negotiations fail to transpire.

The Abramovich Dilemma: A Veritable Catch-22

Abramovich bought Chelsea for a reported £140m back in 19 years ago but was forced to let go due to UK government sanctions over his alleged close ties to Russian president Vladimir Putin - a claim he denies [1][3]. The sale took place under the oversight of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, contingent upon the proceeds being allocated for Ukrainian war victims. These funds cannot be moved or used without explicit approval from the office.

Ongoing talks between Abramovich's representatives and the Foreign Office have been reported since last July's general election [2]. However, various sources claim that there have been no meetings between Labour ministers and members of the foundation responsible for handling the funds since then. A deadlock persists, with a political decision from a minister being necessitated to move forward with an agreement.

The proceeds of the Chelsea sale, totaling £2.5bn, along with accumulating interest, could augment the reduced aid budget announced in February.

Losing Ground on the Road to Justice for Ukraine

The impasse around the frozen funds has sparked criticism from aid organizations and politicians who highlight the urgent necessity for support for Ukraine. A legal battle could not only prolong the delay in distributing aid but also open up avenues for fresh debates on the legality, fairness, and ethical implications of the intended use of the funds.

In essence, as the legal chessboard echoes with the looming threats and the push for humanitarian aid, the saga of Roman Abramovich and the Chelsea Football Club sale proceeds promises to unfold into a captivating drama.

  1. Amidst the ongoing political standoff, the UK government is planning to escalate its war-and-conflicts policy-and-legislation against Roman Abramovich, threatening to take him to court over the frozen proceeds of his sale of Chelsea Football Club.
  2. Despite ongoing negotiations with Abramovich and his representatives, the impasse has led to a deadlock in sanctions implementation, presenting a challenge in the general-news domain as the fate of humanitarian aid for Ukraine hangs in the balance.
  3. The criminal case unfolding over the Chelsea sale proceeds serves as a test case for crime-and-justice and international politics, with its repercussions extending to the larger question of the ethical use of funds, particularly in the context of ongoing war-and-conflicts.

Read also:

Latest