Race for essential minerals
China's control over a significant portion of the world's critical minerals is exerting major influences on resource-rich countries and their development trajectories by 2040, with significant geopolitical, economic, and industrial implications.
Resource Leverage and Geopolitical Influence
Beijing has established near-monopolies in key minerals like antimony, gallium, graphite, rare earths, tungsten, lithium, and titanium. This dominance allows China to use these resources as geopolitical tools or economic weapons, impacting global supply chains and trade negotiations, particularly with Western powers such as the US and its allies.
Supply Chain Dependence and Vulnerabilities
Many countries, including the US and its strategic allies, rely heavily on Chinese-controlled minerals for high-tech manufacturing, defense systems, consumer electronics, and clean energy technologies. This dependence exposes them to supply disruptions, price shocks, and restricted access to essential inputs, hampering their technological and defense advancements.
Economic and Development Challenges for Resource-Rich Countries
While resource-rich countries could potentially benefit from China’s investments and infrastructure programs, they risk falling into strategic dependencies that limit their bargaining power and long-term development prospects. Control over refining and downstream processing stages, mostly centered in China, means many countries remain locked in low-value extraction roles without capturing substantial economic benefits or developing local industries.
Global Response Shaping Future Development Patterns
The US, along with the Quad countries (the US, Japan, Australia, India), and others are attempting to diversify supply chains, increase domestic production, and invest in R&D to reduce reliance on China. These efforts could shape future industry standards and geopolitical alignments, potentially determining which countries lead the clean energy and high-tech industrial revolutions by 2040. Countries able to build resilient, value-added sectors in critical minerals stand to bolster their development, while those failing to do so may face economic marginalization or increased external control.
The DRC-Rwanda Peace Agreement
In a separate development, the DRC-Rwanda peace agreement brokered by the Trump administration promises access to critical minerals to the US, in exchange for security guarantees.
As the world moves towards a cleaner, more technologically advanced future, the control over critical minerals will continue to be a significant factor in global power dynamics. The ability to strike a balance between engagement with China, investment in local capacity building, and alignment with emerging global supply chain alliances will be crucial for the development of resource-rich countries by 2040.
[1]: Source 1 [2]: Source 2 [3]: Source 3 [4]: Source 4 [5]: Source 5
- Despite China's influence in critical mineral resources, efforts addressing deforestation and preserving biodiversity could significantly reduce the need for minerals like lithium, which are commonly used in clean energy technologies, thereby lessening the reliance on China and providing a more sustainable development path for many countries by 2040. [Source 4]
- The ongoing global focus on achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 aligns with efforts to combat climate change, decrease carbon emissions, and promote renewable energy. In sports, green initiatives such as carbon-neutral tournaments could serve as models for industrial sectors, demonstrating the potential for a more sustainable future where the demand for minerals like coal and graphite may decrease, reducing their geopolitical significance by 2040. [Source 5]
