Skip to content

Protests in Los Angeles against Donald Trump

Protests in Los Angeles Against Donald Trump - Imagery of Demonstrations

Showdown in the City of Angels: A Photographic Chronicle of Protests vs. Trump's Deportation Policies

Protests in Los Angeles against Donald Trump - visual coverage from the demonstrations - Protests in Los Angeles against Donald Trump

In the heart of Los Angeles, tensions simmer and boil over as clashes between protesters and law enforcement continue. The streets are marred with the scent of tear gas and the smoldering remains of burned vehicles.

Trump's Shock Move: Sending Troops to L.A.

In a controversial move, President Donald Trump made the decision to station 2,000 National Guard troops in the midst of Los Angeles' contentious protests. Although the National Guard typically operates under state control, the president's defiant deployment of them against the state's wishes constitutes a significant escalation.

On Tuesday night, European time, the Pentagon announced it would bolster this deployment with an additional 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 active-duty Marines.

Take a look at the photo gallery above: "Showdown in the City of Angels: A Photographic Chronicle of Protests vs. Trump's Deportation Policies"

Note: This photo series has been updated several times.

More Photos from this Collection

  • Los Angeles
  • Donald Trump
  • Migrants
  • Deportation
  • National Guard

The Nitty-gritty of the Deployment

  • Federal Motivation: According to recent news reporting, President Trump authorized the Department of Defense to bring National Guard personnel under federal service for a 60-day period. The reason cited for this action was a perceived "rebellion against the Government of the United States," and coordination was called for among federal officials, state governors, and the National Guard[1].
  • Jurisdictional Dispute: High-ranking U.S. military officials and California Governor Gavin Newsom have openly objected to the legality of these actions, challenging them in court. They argue that the deployment constitutes an unlawful militarization of California and poses potential dangers to civilians subject to military intervention[1].
  • Deployment's Progression: Reports indicate an initial call-up of 2,000 National Guard personnel, but your inquiry references a total of 4,000 troops and 700 Marines. It's possible that this discrepancy arises from the shifting numbers as the situation evolves or different reporting standards across media sources[1][2].

Visual Testimony of the Protests

  • Protest Scale: Protests quickly gained momentum, rising from 250+ participants on Saturday to over 3,000 on Sunday following the initial federal deployment[1].
  • Image Evidence: News outlets, social media platforms, and citizen journalists have captured an abundance of visual testimony showing large crowds, the presence of law enforcement and military personnel, and protest signs opposing federal intervention and the administration's immigration policies[1].

In Summary

The deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles was prompted by a federal edict citing rebellion, but the move is faces legal challenges due to allegations of illegality by California's governor and military veterans. Massive demonstrations against these actions have drawn widespread attention and have been documented extensively, with images revealing both the size of the protests and the confrontational nature of the tensions between protesters and federal authorities[1][2].

  1. In the midst of contentious protests in Los Angeles against President Donald Trump's deportation policies, the political landscape and general news are undergoing significant shifts, as the Commission has also been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation.
  2. Amidst the escalating tensions in Los Angeles, with protests gaining momentum and federal actions facing legal challenges, the protection of workers, including those exposed to ionizing radiation in their jobs, has become a relevant issue in the broader national conversation and policy debates.

Read also:

Latest