Skip to content

proposed council directive to harmonize food labeling laws among member states

Deputies from the Green Party and La France insoumise have signed a motion criticizing the government regarding Article 49.3, as proposed by Duplomb. They have declared they will vote for this motion on Wednesday. The Socialists and the National Rally are urged to abstain from voting.

Deputies from the Green Party and France Insoumise, sponsors of a motion criticizing the...
Deputies from the Green Party and France Insoumise, sponsors of a motion criticizing the government's use of 'parliamentary 49.3' in the Duplumb bill, have declared they will support it on Wednesday. The Socialists and National Rally are anticipated to abstain from voting.

proposed council directive to harmonize food labeling laws among member states

Revised Article:

Folks, let's chat about a curious event that might spark some questions. On Tuesday, June 3rd, during the France Insoumise group's (LFI) press conference at the National Assembly, the motion of censure was noticeably absent in the deputies' speeches. Only during the Q&A session did it surface. Signed by 58 LFI deputies and two ecologists, the motion is set for discussion in the Hemicycle on Wednesday at 2 pm, amidst questions to the government. However, the outcome won't be known until the end of the afternoon, and it seems likely that this seventh motion of censure against the government of François Bayrou will be rejected by the parliamentarians.

This move aligns with a strategy backed by the government bloc and the far-right, accelerating the legislative process through a preliminary motion of rejection. On May 26th, they rejected their own text, the bill of Senator Laurent Duplomb (The Republicans), aiming to lift the constraints on the farmer's profession. An unusual move aimed to bypass the potential delays caused by thousands of deposited amendments and send the bill straight to the mixed parliamentary committee.

Interestingly, a similar scenario unfolded on Monday, June 2nd. Yet, there seems to be a discrepancy in the information available, as there's no evidence of a unanimous rejection of a bill on the A69 construction site mentioned earlier in the article. Instead, it appears that a half-built A69 motorway in south-west France was halted by court action due to potential legal or environmental concerns[1]. It's possible that this incident is unrelated to a legislative bill rejection. Additionally, sources suggest that the resumption of work on the A69 construction site could be seen as a practical decision, indicating a possible resolution or continuation of the project[3]. But more details on a specific bill or its rejection remain elusive. Here's hoping for a clearer picture soon!

  1. Amidst policy-and-legislation debates, the strategy of bypassing potential delays by rejecting bills and sending them to mixed parliamentary committees has become a prevalent practice in politics, as seen in the recent deliberations surrounding the farmer's profession bill and the A69 construction site issue.
  2. In the realm of general-news, the continued use of motions of censure, such as the upcoming debate scheduled for Wednesday in the Hemicycle against François Bayrou's government, underscores the ongoing political tensions and the complex process of policy-making in France's parliament.

Read also:

Latest