Skip to content

Prominent attorney voices concern over Bavarian Broadcasting's management, describing it as disheartening.

Bayerischer Rundfunk's approach towards the podcast release has left a prominent lawyer unhappy.

High-profile attorney speaks candidly about Bavarian Broadcasting's management, deeming it...
High-profile attorney speaks candidly about Bavarian Broadcasting's management, deeming it disappointing.

Bavarian Broadcasting's approach, as discussed by a prominent lawyer post-podcast, leaves a sense of disenchantment. - Prominent attorney voices concern over Bavarian Broadcasting's management, describing it as disheartening.

In a recent development, criminal defense lawyer Alexander Stevens has parted ways with the popular true-crime podcast "Bayern 3 True Crime." The reasons behind Stevens' departure and the Bavarian Broadcasting Corporation (BR)'s response to criticism surrounding the podcast remain unclear.

Stevens, a prominent figure in German criminal law, is known for his work on the podcast and his numerous media appearances. He specializes in capital and sexual offenses and has represented high-profile clients such as one of the defendants in the Starnberg triple murder trial and musician Gil Ofarim in his defamation trial.

The BR has announced that they will produce their true-crime podcast without Stevens in the future. However, the corporation has not provided specific reasons for ending their collaboration with the lawyer. Media-critical platform "Übermedien" has criticized Stevens for exploiting cases from his own law practice for entertainment purposes, a claim that Stevens denies.

There has been increasing criticism of "Bayern 3 True Crime," including criticism of the light-hearted chatter about serious acts of violence. Stevens and his podcast partner, Jacqueline Belle, discuss personal topics unrelated to the respective case during their podcast. Stevens argues that dealing with serious cases is their profession, and a certain emotional distance is necessary to practice as a criminal defense attorney.

Despite the controversy, Stevens maintains that his approach is not about entertainment but about legal interest and a look over the edge of one's own world without being directly involved in the cases. The cases discussed in the podcast were tried in a public court proceeding, allowing for public discussion.

Stevens has not heard anything from the Bar Association about his public handling of his cases. The BR has waived license revenues to terminate the licensing contract early, but they have not reimbursed the costs incurred from exchanging the case at their request.

In a separate development, the true-crime live show that Stevens and Belle tour with was changed after complaints from relatives of a murder victim. All the cases Stevens discusses in the podcast are heavily anonymized to protect client confidentiality.

As the situation unfolds, it is clear that the podcast and live show, though under different responsibilities, may have contributed to Stevens' exit from "Bayern 3 True Crime." Stevens offers a solution for cost reimbursement for the exchange of the case, but it was declined by the BR. The future of Stevens' career in true-crime media remains uncertain.

[1] [Source 1] [2] [Source 2]

"I'm not sure I'm ready for this," Stevens remarked, struggling with the mounting criticism surrounding his approach to entertainment in true-crime podcasting. The entertainment aspect of his podcast, titled "Bayern 3 True Crime," has been a subject of controversy, with media-critical platform "Übermedien" accusing him of exploiting cases from his own law practice for entertainment purposes.

Read also:

    Latest