"Production Halt: American Small Businesses Struggle Under Pressure of Changing Tariffs"
==================================================================================
In the heart of Cambodia, a year ago, American businessman Knepler moved his equipment and molds to the Southeast Asian country, hoping to avoid the 25% tariffs in China. However, his optimism was short-lived.
This year, the planned duty for Cambodian imports has risen to 49%, causing a significant strain on Knepler's Pennsylvania-based company, True Places. "We're burdened with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt from relocating the company's production," Knepler lamented.
Knepler's experience reflects that of many US companies producing goods abroad. In 2025, the Trump administration has significantly raised tariffs, affecting various sectors, including goods coming from countries perceived as beneficiaries of tariff avoidance or unfair trade advantages.
For instance, products from China, such as those made by Barton O'Brien, a Maryland-based seller of dog harnesses, now face an additional 30% duty. To cope with the increased costs, some businesses pass on the new tariffs as a surcharge to customers.
The economic consequences for these businesses are far-reaching. The average tariff rate has risen to 17.6% from 2.8% at the start of the year, the highest level since the early 1930s. This has led to increased import tariffs, costlier goods, and squeezed profit margins, or forced price increases on consumers.
Moreover, the tariffs have put pressure on supply chain strategies. Companies are reevaluating the cost-effectiveness of foreign production given the higher tariffs that diminish their competitive advantage. Some firms might reconsider shifting production back to the US or closer allied countries to avoid punitive tariffs and logistical complications.
The cumulative effect of such tariffs contributes to a slowdown in US real GDP growth and higher unemployment. While some US manufacturing sectors might see output increases, overall economic activity outside manufacturing could contract, indicating a mixed impact.
Trade tensions and tariff escalations have also complicated international trade relations. Ongoing negotiations and retaliations affecting bilateral agreements could impact exports and imports linked to Cambodia-based manufacturing.
Knepler compares the rapid policy changes to spinning a "wheel of misfortune," with new tariffs each time. He expresses concern about the unpredictability of future tariff rates. Similarly, Barton O'Brien accelerated production and borrowed money to bring in as much inventory as possible before Trump took office.
Despite the challenges, some companies, like O'Brien, are adjusting. He noted that he, along with his competitors, will have to raise prices together due to the tariffs. Others have halted imports when duties reached prohibitive levels, hoping for bilateral trade deals.
In the face of these challenges, the future remains uncertain for US companies producing goods abroad, particularly those that shifted production to Cambodia and now face significant tariff increases. Strategic adjustments, including raising prices, absorbing costs, or reconsidering production locations, will likely be necessary to navigate these challenging times.
[1] [Source 1] [2] [Source 2] [3] [Source 3] [4] [Source 4]
- The unpredictable changes in tariffs, as experienced by Knepler and Barton O'Brien, have highlighted the intersection of business, politics, and general-news, raising concerns about the future of US companies producing goods abroad.
- The increasing tariffs on goods imported from countries like Cambodia, as Knepler's case demonstrates, have not only affected businesses financially but also introduced complexities in the crime-and-justice domain, as companies grapple with the potential legal ramifications of reconsidering production locations to avoid punitive tariffs.
