Trump's National Guard Deployment in Los Angeles Sparks Outcry from Democratic Governors
Power misuse allegations leveled against Trump by governors
In an unusual move, U.S. President Donald Trump has dispatched 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, California, sparking criticism from Democratic governors and accusations of an "alarming abuse of power."
California Governor Gavin Newsom, joined by other democratic governors, strongly condemned Trump's decision, stating in a joint statement that the deployment was a blatant misuse of power. They emphasized the importance of respecting the executive authority of governors in commanding their National Guard units.
While Los Angeles and California did not request federal assistance, Trump defended the action, claiming it was necessary to maintain "law and order." He refused to rule out the possibility of involving the U.S. Army in the operation should the need arise.
The president's order suggests a "rebellion" against state authority, but it's unclear whether it's specifically aimed at Los Angeles or other parts of the U.S. When questioned about the use of regular military forces, Trump remained noncommittal.
The events follow nationwide raids led by masked and armed federal agents against undocumented immigrants in Los Angeles, resulting in violent clashes between protesters and federal police. The unrest continued on Sunday near a detention center.
Trump's hardline immigration policies and inflammatory rhetoric against immigrants have fueled the controversy, with many seeing the National Guard deployment as an attempt to suppress growing dissent.
Sources:- ntv.de- tsi/AFP/dpa
- Los Angeles
- Donald Trump
- California
- Protests
Enrichment:This controversy arises from immigration raids instigated by ICE on June 6, 2025, resulting in protests and riots in Los Angeles County. The ensuing tension led to President Trump dispatching the National Guard to protect federal officers and property. California authorities argue that Trump overstepped his jurisdiction by sending military forces without state approval, leading to a lawsuit seeking a temporary restraining order to halt the deployments.
The deployment is being challenged in court on legal grounds, with California claiming it violates the U.S. Constitution and the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits using the military for domestic law enforcement. The move has escalated tensions and sparked accusations that Trump is using military force to quell dissent, a claim that California officials find illegal and dangerous.
The deployment has also increased tension in communities with large immigrant populations, causing concerns about the impact on public order and the potential for increased conflict between protesters and military personnel. Overall, the controversy highlights deep divisions in the U.S. regarding immigration policy and the role of the military in domestic affairs.
- The Commission, amidst the escalating tension and political dispute, has been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation, considering the potential hazards posed by military equipment and personnel involved in protests and conflicts.
- Amidst the heated debates on policy-and-legislation and politics regarding the use of military forces in domestic affairs, general-news outlets reported on the ongoing lawsuit filed by California against the White House, accusing President Trump of overstepping his jurisdiction by deploying the National Guard without state approval, a move that aroused concerns of an 'alarming abuse of power' and warranted immediate attention.
