Potential Consequences of Shutting Down the Education Department

Potential Consequences of Shutting Down the Education Department

In the current political landscape, the Department of Education (ED) under President Trump's administration is undergoing a significant transformation. The President, through an executive order, has instructed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to facilitate the closure or dismantling of the agency "to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law."

Since March 2025, nearly 1,400 employees—about one-third to almost half of the agency's workforce—have been placed on administrative leave and eventually terminated or laid off. The Supreme Court's recent decision to lift a lower court injunction that had ordered the reinstatement of these employees has allowed the Trump administration to continue its reduction in force while legal challenges proceed.

The Trump administration's actions extend beyond staff reductions, with over $6 billion in federal education funding being frozen, grants cancelled, and key programs transferred to other agencies like the Treasury and Small Business Administration. Critical office divisions such as the Office for Civil Rights and student aid have been deeply impacted, leading to disruptions in civil rights enforcement, student loans and aid processes, research funding, and data collection.

The changes have also affected education policies around higher education grants, K–12 protections (especially for transgender students), and curriculum issues like critical race theory. The Obama-era gainful employment rule, which set a debt-to-earnings ratio that required career-oriented programs to ensure their graduates could make enough money to repay their loans, could be far less onerous on for-profit colleges in a second Trump term. Title IX regulations about how schools and colleges handle sex-based discrimination would still be required to be followed, even if the Education Department were dismantled.

The potential effects of these actions are far-reaching. The massive reduction in workforce hinders the ED's ability to fulfill statutory duties, such as enforcing civil rights, administering student aid programs, and conducting research. The freeze on federal education funding and the transfer of student loan functions create instability for borrowers and disrupt university programs dependent on federal aid.

Legal and political conflicts are also a result of the administration's dismantling attempts, with multiple lawsuits and opposition from states, school districts, and teachers' unions arguing that the administration's actions exceed the executive branch's authority without Congressional approval.

The administration frames its reforms as returning authority to states and reducing federal bureaucracy, but this could lead to uneven education standards and protections. The special education law, known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, was passed in 1975 and would not change without an act of Congress.

In the event of the Department of Education's closure, student loans could shift to the Treasury Department, and Title IX enforcement, and the staff responsible for that work, would likely be moved to the Department of Justice. The dismantling of the Department of Education could also affect early education programs, such as Head Start and the Child Care Development Block Grant, which are not a part of the Education Department and would not be directly affected by an Education Department shutdown.

The College Cost Reduction Act, proposed by Republicans in Congress, could increase the amount of federal Pell grants for third- and fourth-year college students pursuing bachelor's degrees in fields considered to be in high demand. It would also simplify the student loan repayment process and end certain kinds of loans available to parents, graduate students, and low-income learners.

In conclusion, the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the federal Department of Education have profound implications for the agency's ability to operate effectively and for the broader U.S. education system. The ongoing legal battles and potential effects on civil rights enforcement, student financial aid, and federal oversight continue to be subject to much debate and discussion.

1. The Trump administration's actions towards the Department of Education (ED) could lead to a shift in student loans from the ED to the Treasury Department.
2. The potential dismantling of the ED could affect community schools and charter schools, as the agency plays a significant role in K-12 protections, especially for vulnerable student groups like transgender students.
3. The freeze on federal education funding and the transfer of student loan functions create instability, potentially increasing student debt for borrowers and disrupting university programs dependent on federal aid.
4. The massive reduction in the ED's workforce has impacted special education, with disruptions in civil rights enforcement and research funding that supports students with disabilities.
5. Innovation in education policies, such as the College Cost Reduction Act proposed by Republicans in Congress, could seek to simplify the student loan repayment process and increase funding for higher education students in high-demand fields.
6. The changes in policy and legislation regarding education, driven by politics, have sparked discussions about the intricacies of higher education, community schools, charter schools, and the potential effects on inequality in education.

Read also: