Skip to content
crime-and-justice — Federal — Opinion — Politics — Friedrich — War-and-conflicts — Migration — Known — Extremism — Recordings — General-news

Political party AfD of Germany files lawsuit following labeling as "right-wing extremist" by intelligence agency.

Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party disputes the 'extremist' label, imposed last week by the country's domestic intelligence agency, contending it infringes upon their rights to privacy and freedom of speech by heightening surveillance.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read

Political party AfD of Germany files lawsuit following labeling as "right-wing extremist" by intelligence agency.

Here's a rewritten version of your article:

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party decided to sue the country's domestic intelligence service on Monday, claiming they were wrongfully labeled as a right-wing extremist organization. This move subjects the party to heightened scrutiny from the authorities.

The lawsuit was filed at the administrative court in Cologne, where the intelligence service resides. Since the label, the intelligence service can employ informants and tools such as audio and video recordings to closely monitor the party's activities.

The domestic intelligence service's decision to categorize AfD as an extremist group is based on three main reasons:

  1. The service accuses the party of disregarding human dignity, particularly in their treatment of refugees and migrants, many from Muslim-majority countries. They claim this is demonstrated by the party's persistent negative rhetoric.
  2. The party's ideology is perceived as anti-constitutional, aiming to exclude non-ethnic Germans from societal participation and assigning a lesser status to individuals with migration backgrounds.
  3. Investigations have uncovered connections between AfD members and known right-wing extremist groups, along with numerous public statements advocating exclusionary policies.

The AfD argues that the intelligence service is violating the constitution by attempting to criminalize their permitted expressions of criticism towards Germany's immigration policy over the past decade. In their lawsuit, they reject the label as a politically motivated move aimed at suppressing dissent.

In response to the controversial decision, some high-ranking US officials have voiced their disapproval. For instance, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio took to social media, criticizing the move as "tyranny in disguise" and calling on Germany to reverse the classification. The German Foreign Ministry countered Rubio's comments, stating that the decision was made to uphold the constitution and protect the rule of law.

The lawsuit comes as former Chancellor Angela Merkel's successor, Friedrich Merz, gears up to take power as Chancellor, replacing Olaf Scholz. Meanwhile, Merz's conservative movement (CDU/CSU) and Scholz's Social Democrats have formally signed a coalition agreement, setting the stage for a new governing alliance to assume power under Merz.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Insights:- The BfV's classification of AfD is based on a three-year investigation, during which they found the party systematically violates core constitutional principles, engaging in anti-constitutional ideology, violations of human dignity and equality, and promoting extremist networks and rhetoric. (15%)- The lawsuit and the controversial decision have sparked international attention, with some top US officials criticizing Germany's move. (15%)- The domestic intelligence service's decision was based on a detailed, 1,000-page report documenting systemic breaches of democratic norms. (15%)- The AfD disputes the classification as politically motivated and has launched legal challenges. (15%)

  1. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party claims that the German domestic intelligence service violated the constitution by labeling them as a right-wing extremist organization, a move that subjects them to increased scrutiny from authorities.
  2. The lawsuit, filed at the administrative court in Cologne, could permit the intelligence service to employ informants and tools such as audio and video recordings to closely monitor the party's activities.
  3. The intelligence service's labeling of AfD as an extremist group is primarily due to their perceived disregard for human dignity, demonstrated through persistent negative rhetoric toward refugees and migrants, especially from Muslim-majority countries.
  4. Additionally, the service asserted that the party's ideology is anti-constitutional, aimed at excluding non-ethnic Germans from societal participation and assigning a lesser status to individuals with migration backgrounds.
  5. Investigations have revealed connections between AfD members and known right-wing extremist groups, along with numerous public statements advocating exclusionary policies, further supporting the extremist label.
  6. This controversy over the AfD's classification has attracted international attention, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticizing the move as "tyranny in disguise," while the German Foreign Ministry defends the decision, stating it's intended to uphold the constitution and protect the rule of law.
Right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) party contends that the label of
Germany's right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) party contends the

Read also:

Related

Latest