Political Discussion: Delicacy of Enforcement Proceedings for AfD

Coping with a political party winning elections and public opinion polls, yet consistently deemed as far-right extremist, necessitates thoughtful examination from political, legal, and societal perspectives.

, and ASMedia

2025 August 29 . 3:29 PM

2 min read

"AfD on the Delicacy of Enacting Ban Procedures"

Political Discussion: Delicacy of Enforcement Proceedings for AfD

In Germany, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), a political party classified as right-wing extremist by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), is under close scrutiny when it comes to party funding[1]. The BfV, which has the authority to limit funding for parties that are deemed extremist, is responsible for monitoring the party's financial activities[1].

The BfV's classification enables it to conduct extensive surveillance on the party's activities, including financial matters. This scrutiny can provide grounds for legal and administrative actions such as reducing or withdrawing public funds if the party is found to violate laws or constitutional norms tied to extremist behavior[1][2].

German law provides for oversight of party financing to ensure transparency and legality. Funds received, especially public subsidies, are routinely audited. If abuses or illicit funding sources are detected, sanctions or funding bans may be imposed[2].

If the AfD's classification leads to further proceedings, such as a party ban initiated by the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), then party funding could be wholly or partially suspended depending on the court’s rulings[2]. This court is the highest authority able to ban parties and thus has decisive influence on funding rights.

The debates about how to handle the AfD have intensified following its classification by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Proving the unconstitutionality of the entire party would be challenging, but a party ban against the AfD is currently considered more feasible than it was for the NPD in 2017[3].

Checking the state party funding of the AfD would not immediately result in a ban, but it could potentially weaken the party's financial resources[4]. Such a move would take away the party's basis for the victim role it plays, which has been a significant part of its political strategy[5].

The AfD has already announced legal measures in response to any party ban procedure[6]. The hurdles for a state party funding check are the same as for a party ban, making the process a complex and lengthy one[7].

The AfD's state party funding currently stands at 45 percent[8]. Subscribing to topics and saving articles related to this issue requires a Staatsanzeiger subscription[9]. The withdrawal of funds is only possible if the conditions for constitutional hostility are given[10].

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution sees the AfD's handling of refugees and people with a migration background as a critical violation of human dignity[11]. The debates about the AfD's future remain ongoing, with many calling for stricter measures to combat right-wing extremism in German politics.

References: