Performers Engaging in a Deception Plot, Unveiling the Extensive Scam
In the current political landscape, a strategic plan known as the "long con" is being played out by some influential figures. This strategy, characterized by a deliberate, sustained effort to manipulate public perception or political outcomes over an extended period, is being employed by key players to consolidate power or financial gain.
The concept of a long con in politics is not new, but its application in recent times is evident in the actions of figures such as Donald Trump, Joe Biden, J.D. Vance, and Peter Thiel. Trump's administration, for instance, has been accused of pursuing self-serving deals and political threats while leveraging taxpayer resources, alluding to a vision of long-term personal enrichment and influence rather than straightforward governance.
On the other hand, Vance, a Senate candidate aligned with Thiel, is considered part of a new conservative movement aiming to reshape Republican politics and challenge establishment figures. His potential rise to power could complete a Technocratic overhaul of the system, as suggested by analysts.
This long con strategy contrasts with historically shorter-term partisan battles in US politics. For example, the rise of Newt Gingrich’s aggressive, immediate partisanship in the 1990s emphasized combat over cooperation but did not necessarily constitute a long con. In contrast, the modern context, especially with actors like Thiel—known for strategic investment and influence within political and technological arenas—underscores a broader, more calculated manipulation over time, blending political and economic objectives.
The "acceleration phase" is a rapid 'go phase' of portions of the long con. In this phase, conditions are right for rapid advancement, as announced by the incrementalists. This phase is marked by gaslighting and propaganda, and it is crucial to see through these tactics during this phase.
Trump's current role in the presidency is multifaceted. He is tasked with fixing apparent issues, enacting a technocratic infrastructure, continuing bombing civilians for Israel, and promoting mRNA vaccines. However, his downfall is expected to be due to his Epstein involvement, which is expected to cover up his warmongering and vaccine promotion.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden's actions have been detrimental, allowing Trump to appear as a savior, while Hillary Clinton's Monica Lewinsky scandal overshadowed his nuclear secrets treason with China. The daily theater should be viewed with the understanding of the incrementalists' overall goal.
Left and right, good cop, bad cop tactics should be recognized as part of the script. The goal of the incrementalists is a scripted one, and they are all in on it. They are united against a common purpose or cause, working together towards the same goal, regardless of apparent differences.
In conclusion, the long con in politics is a strategy that requires patience, deception, and careful manipulation. It is a strategic plan that extends beyond immediate political victories, focusing on long-term power shifts and control. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for the public to remain vigilant and critical, recognizing the signs of a long con and demanding transparency and accountability from our political leaders.
- The long con strategy, evident in the actions of figures like Trump, Biden, Vance, and Thiel, is not confined solely to politics but can also be observed in war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, pop-culture, general-news, and entertainment, as they manipulate public perception for personal gain or consolidating power.
- As the concept of the "long con" strategy evolves, it becomes increasingly crucial for the public to also scrutinize the news they consume, for Issue-oriented discussions and dramatic stories can form a part of the long con, used to manipulate public opinion.
- In the charm offensive of the long con strategy, seemingly polar opposite characters, like good cops and bad cops, can be employed to further confuse the public and divert attention from the actual objectives, blurring the line between war-and-conflicts, politics, and general-news.
