Breaking away from Trump, Pence Falls Short on Truth and Unity
Over a year since his fateful decision, Vice President Mike Pence broke his silence, potentially hinting at presidential aspirations of his own. Addressing an audience at the Florida chapter of the Federalist Society last Friday, he dismissed Trump's claims of having the power to sway the election results. "Trump's wrong," Pence declared. "I don't have the power to flip the results."
Pence's remarks were met with praise from political analysts like Beth Levine of Vanity Fair, who lauded him as "a backbone grown." However, the acclaim was undeserved, as Pence continued to seek recognition for his minimal efforts while publicly criticizing his former boss.
In the process, Pence exacerbated an existing problem: Trump's repeated lies about voter fraud undercut public trust in our electoral system.
If Pence truly wanted to be a backbone, he would not join Trump's fictitious camp, as he did last March, when he challenged the integrity of the 2020 election due to unsubstantiated claims of "significant" and "disturbing" irregularities. Only last month did Pence attempt to frame legislation limiting voting rights on a state level as measures "aimed at restoring trust in the integrity of our elections."
However, it's important to clarify that there's no evidence to suggest that our electoral system lacks integrity. If such evidence existed, Trump's appointed and Pence-led Election Integrity Commission would have uncovered it. Instead, the commission was disbanded in 2018, having found no evidence of the election fraud allegations by the President. Unfortunately, the belief in voter fraud among Republicans has become almost a party identification symbol. According to a recent University of Massachusetts and ABC News poll, 71% of Republicans still doubt the official election results for 2020.
A day after Pence's speech, Trump released a statement, branding him "just an automatic orbit for the old Mitch McConnell," claiming Trump wanted to quickly install Biden as President. Naturally, Trump's mention of McConnell served two purposes: to position McConnell as a replacement for the old Republican Establishment, which Trump rejects, and to disparage McConnell-the one Trump praised as the "best thing that ever happened" in December.
Trump continued to peddle lies about "obvious signs of electoral fraud or irregularities" and suggested that Pence should consider withdrawing his certification of the 2020 election results. By repeating these falsehoods, Trump brought the true controversy into focus: he wilfully disseminated lies to deflect from his own actions on Jan 6, 2021, and Pence's subsequent justifications of those actions.
The lies of Republican power-brokers, seeking the White House in 2024
In a surprising turn, Pence argued that the widespread belief in voter fraud among Republicans has become almost an indicator of party affiliation. According to many analysts, Pence's stance may further tarnish the reputable image of the Republican party as a whole, given his lack of concrete evidence to support his claims.
With Pence's determination to challenge Trump's falsehoods, he could potentially launch a compelling political campaign. Truth-telling and defending democracy - these are honors Pence could rightfully claim. It may even serve as an intriguing backdrop for the 2024 presidential race.
Read also:
In the end, it was Pence who recognized the widespread belief in voter fraud among Republicans as a powerful tool. He could condemn Trump for failing to provide proof of fraud and refer to the numerous court rulings and investigations that found nothing amiss in the 2020 election.
Many analysts argue that Pence's stance may tarnish the reputation of Republicans by aligning himself with unfounded alleged voter fraud claims without any concrete evidence.
Source:
Mike Pence has faced criticism and challenges for his stance on voter fraud claims in the 2020 US elections. Some key arguments against his position are:
- Lack of Evidence: Numerous fact-checking organizations, including FactCheck.org, have consistently debunked Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud. Court rejections of Trump's legal challenges to the election results also indicate that there was no factual or legal basis for his claims.
- Legal Challenges: Trump's legal challenges to the election results were rejected by courts at all levels, including the Supreme Court. This rejection indicates that there was no factual or legal basis for his claims of election irregularities.
- Constitutional Authority: Pence himself acknowledged in a letter to Congress that he lacked the unilateral authority to overturn the election results. This acknowledgment was in line with the Constitution, which does not grant the Vice President such power.
- Incitement of Violence: The January 6, 2021, Capitol attack was directly linked to Trump's rhetoric and actions. Pence was one of the targets of the rioters, which highlighted the dangerous consequences of spreading false claims about elections.
- Political Pressure: Pence faced intense pressure from Trump to block the certification of the election results, despite lacking the constitutional authority to do so. By refusing to comply with Trump's demands, Pence upheld the Constitution and maintained the integrity of the democratic process.
- Historical Context: Many scholars and historians have characterized Trump's efforts to overturn the election as an attempted self-coup, which Pence's actions did not support. This perspective underscores the gravity of Trump's actions and the importance of Pence's refusal to participate in them.
- Personal Safety Concerns: The threats against Pence's life during the Capitol attack were a direct result of Trump's rhetoric. This incident highlighted the personal risks that public officials face when they are pressured to support false claims about elections.
In summary, the arguments against Mike Pence's stance on voter fraud claims in the 2020 US elections include the lack of evidence, the rejection of legal challenges, Pence's acknowledgment of constitutional limitations, the incitement of violence, and the personal safety concerns he faced.
