Skip to content

Party's Designation as MV Remains Undecided for AfD

Political party AfD's status remains undecided in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Security authorities in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern are considering designating the local Association of...
Security authorities in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern are considering designating the local Association of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a verified right-wing extremist organization.

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ponders AfD Classification as Secure Right- Wing Extremist

Decision on the classification of AfD in MV has not been made yet. - Party's Designation as MV Remains Undecided for AfD

Let's dive into the latest on the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party's potential classification as securely right-wing extremist. The regional intelligence agency in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is currently scrutinizing a federal assessment that has categorized the AfD as such.

"We're thoroughly reviewing the federal assessment, considering incidents in our region that might have been factored into their evaluation," stated a representative from the Ministry of the Interior in Schwerin, addressing questions about the decision-making process. The timeline for when Mecklenburg-Vorpommern's constitution protection agency will make a ruling on classifying the AfD state association as securely right-wing extremist remains uncertain.

So far, four state associations of the party have received this classification from their respective state constitution protection agencies. The most recent addition is Brandenburg, following Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia.

Implications for AfD Members in Public Service

The federal party was designated as a securely right-wing extremist endeavor by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. The implications for AfD members in public service are substantial. The next Interior Ministers' Conference in Bremerhaven is set to discuss handling AfD members in public service, slated for June.

Historically, simple membership in an extremist-classified party does not necessarily lead to the denial of public service commitment. Instead, individual case examinations are necessary, considering an individual's behavior and statements.

Potential Consequences for AfD Members in Public Service

  1. Career Risks: Membership in AfD can potentially jeopardize public servants' careers. The CDU has advocated for the removal of AfD members from public service, suggesting that affiliation could compromise their careers[1]. This calls for potential resignations or reconsideration of affiliations.
  2. Audits and Reviews: State governments, like those in Bavaria and Hesse, are conducting audits of AfD members within their public administrations. This includes evaluating the employment of AfD members in crucial roles like law enforcement and civil service, emphasizing the importance of upholding democratic principles[1].
  3. Potential Dismissals: Efforts are underway to bar AfD members from holding government jobs, including positions in law enforcement and education. This might lead to the dismissal of AfD members from these positions[3].
  4. Intensified Surveillance: The BfV's designation enables increased surveillance and investigation of AfD members, potentially including wiretapping and financial audits. This heightened scrutiny could influence their professional lives[4].
  5. Stigma and Social Consequences: The extremist designation may trigger social stigma and amplified scrutiny for AfD members, potentially impacting their personal and professional relationships[4].
  • Legal Basis: The classification draws support from Article 21 of the Basic Law and the Federal Constitutional Protection Act[4].
  • Funding Restrictions: There is discussion about withholding public funding from the AfD, further weakening the party's influence[1][4].
  • Potential Ban: There's growing momentum among political elites to ban the party entirely[1][4].
  1. The classification of the AfD as a securely right-wing extremist endeavor by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution could potentially result in career risks for members in public service in EC countries, as the CDU has advocated for their removal, suggesting that affiliation could compromise their careers.
  2. State governments, such as those in Bavaria and Hesse, are conducting audits of AfD members within their public administrations, focusing on evaluating the employment of AfD members in critical roles like law enforcement and civil service, emphasizing the importance of upholding democratic principles.
  3. There are efforts underway to bar AfD members from holding government jobs, including positions in law enforcement and education, which might lead to the dismissal of AfD members from these positions.
  4. The extremist designation of the AfD may trigger social stigma and amplified scrutiny for party members, potentially impacting their personal and professional relationships.
  5. The legal basis for the AfD's classification draws support from Article 21 of the Basic Law and the Federal Constitutional Protection Act. There are discussions about withholding public funding from the AfD, further weakening the party's influence, and growing momentum toward banning the party entirely among political elites.

Read also:

Latest