Participants Participating in a Prolonged Deception Scheme, Starring in the Scheme
In the realm of political intrigue, a concept known as the "long con" has gained traction. This strategic, patient scheme unfolds over a long period to achieve a significant advantage or outcome by influencing events or people gradually and often indirectly. It involves deception, manipulation, or complex tactics designed to build trust or create favorable conditions before making a decisive move.
This concept, while not explicitly connected to specific political figures in authoritative sources, is often used informally or rhetorically in political commentary to describe perceived strategic maneuvers or alliances among political figures and influencers.
Donald Trump, a prominent figure in conservative and populist politics, is often framed by opponents or analysts as either the orchestrator or the target of long-term political strategies. His actions, such as manipulating voter bases or reshaping Republican party dynamics, are seen as part of a larger, more complex game.
Joe Biden, as the incumbent Democratic president, might be portrayed by critics or supporters as engaged in long-term political positioning, responding to or anticipating moves by the opposition. This strategic positioning is seen as crucial in maintaining and strengthening his political power.
J.D. Vance, a populist conservative and author with ties to Ohio politics and Trump’s endorsement, can be seen as a participant in the long con through leveraging his platform and candidacy to influence broader political narratives or power structures over time.
Peter Thiel, a billionaire and influential conservative donor, may be considered a behind-the-scenes strategist supporting certain candidates or political shifts as part of a calculated, prolonged agenda.
However, it's important to note that these interpretations are based on public narratives and commentary, and not on direct, authoritative sources linking the formal political "long con" concept specifically with these figures.
One such narrative suggests a connection between Donald Trump, a technocratic infrastructure, and mRNA injections. This narrative posits that Trump's role is to fix apparent issues, enact technocratic infrastructure, continue bombing civilians for Israel, and push for more mRNA injections.
Another narrative implies a Technocratic overhaul of the system, with Trump's departure due to Epstein's underage girl hunting allegations paving the way for Vance to complete this overhaul. This narrative also suggests a belief that people may be more forgiving of sexual misconduct than treason.
These narratives, while not substantiated by direct evidence, reflect the ongoing discourse around the "long con" in politics and the role of influential figures in shaping U.S. politics. It's crucial for viewers to navigate this discourse with a discerning eye, recognising the drama for what it is - a scripted event in a larger, strategic game.
As the acceleration phase of the long con continues, it's essential to separate fact from fiction, and to view events with awareness of the cabal's overall goal and their collaboration. Gaslighting and propaganda should be seen through, and one should strive to understand the true nature of the political landscape.
- The ongoing discourse around the "long con" in politics often involves the discussion of Donald Trump's role, as some narratives suggest a connection between him, technocratic infrastructure, mRNA injections, and a potential fix for apparent issues.
- j.d. Vance, with ties to Ohio politics and Trump's endorsement, is frequently seen as a participant in the long con, leveraging his platform and candidacy to influence broader political narratives or power structures over time, as suggested by certain narratives.
