Skip to content

Parliamentary Intelligence Committee, Excluding AfD and Left Members, Continues Work

The head of Linksfraktion, Reichinnek, and two AfD candidates have all fallen short, leaving just six Members of Parliament in the Bundestag committee.

Parliament's Intelligence Committee, consisting exclusively of non-AfD and non-Left MEPs, meets to...
Parliament's Intelligence Committee, consisting exclusively of non-AfD and non-Left MEPs, meets to discuss national security matters.

Parliamentary Intelligence Committee, Excluding AfD and Left Members, Continues Work

A Single Foe in the Spy Game

Get ready for a one-on-one showdown in the Intelligence Committee of the German Bundestag. Only one opposition member will grace the committee's halls, as neither Heidi Reichinnek of the Left party nor the AfD's Martin Hess and Gerold Otten managed to secure the necessary votes. The Green party's Konstantin von Notz will be the lone voice of opposition, joining three Union MPs, two SPD representatives, and the committee's chair, Marc Henrichmann.

Shrouded in Mystery

The Intelligence Committee oversees the country's intelligence services, delves into sensitive information, and meets in a soundproof room under strict secrecy. While the members are nominated by their respective factions, they must still be elected in the Bundestag.

The Threat from the Shadows

Before the election, CSU parliamentary group leader Alexander Hoffmann expressed reservations about Reichinnek. However, several SPD politicians stated that the Left politician could be elected. The Left had previously linked the election of its faction chair with agreement in other votes. Sören Pellmann, sharing the chair of the Left faction with Reichinnek, threatened after the election results: "It's questionable how the Union intends to secure two-thirds majorities without the Left in the future."

In the previous legislative period, the Left was represented in the committee by André Hahn, who had to leave when the party lost its faction status due to the secession of the BSW. Reichinnek received 260 yes votes, 258 no votes, 27 abstentions, and 42 invalid votes, according to Bundestag Vice President Andrea Lindholz. The AfD candidate Gerold Otten received 127 votes, while his faction colleague Martin Hess received 121 yes votes.

The AfD has been absent from the control committee in recent years. The committee, which handles terrorist threats, constitutional networks, and espionage cases, will be downsized from 13 to 9 members compared to previous years. However, with Reichinnek, Hess, and Otten not elected, there are now only six MPs.

The Echoes of Warning Bells

Politicians from the Greens had warned several times in recent weeks that the reduction could lead to a lack of decision-making. They were the only faction to abstain in the vote on the establishment of the committee.

The required majority in the committee is based on its theoretical size, not the actual number of members. If a member is absent for an extended period, for example due to illness or an accident, the seat remains vacant. Unlike committees in the Bundestag, the PKGr meets independently of elections, allowing politicians who are no longer in the Bundestag to continue participating in meetings.

This change reflects the turbulent politics following the 2025 federal election and the reforms in seat distribution, which reduced the total number of parliamentarians. The political sensitivity surrounding members of the far-right AfD, classified as right-wing extremist by German authorities, may have influenced how many opposition MPs from this party or others are appointed to sensitive committees like Intelligence. The government's cautious approach to the AfD, given their extremist classification and the ongoing legal and political disputes surrounding them, may lead to limiting their access to intelligence matters for security reasons and to avoid granting them undue influence in sensitive oversight roles.

The reduction in opposition representation on the committee raises concerns about democratic accountability and transparency in intelligence oversight, as having only one opposition MP can limit the breadth of scrutiny and critical oversight the committee can exercise on behalf of the opposition. It may also reduce the diversity of viewpoints and weaken the committee’s ability to check the government's intelligence activities, as effective parliamentary scrutiny often requires a balanced representation from both government and opposition. The near-exclusion of opposition MPs might undermine trust in the oversight process.

The Intelligence Committee, responsible for policy-and-legislation concerning the country's intelligence services, has seen a reduction in opposition representation due to the lack of votes for Heidi Reichinnek from the Left party and the AfD's Martin Hess and Gerold Otten. politics

As a result, the committee will only have Konstantin von Notz from the Green party as the lone voice of opposition, raising questions about democratic accountability and transparency in intelligence oversight, and potentially weakening the committee’s ability to exercise critical oversight, given the near-exclusion of opposition MPs. general-news

Read also:

    Latest