Rocky Road for Germany's Immigration Policies: Dobrindt under Fire over Border Rejections
"Our objective is clear"
Let's Chat Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Email Print Copy Link
In the heated world of politics, the topic of immigration has been a hot button issue, especially in Germany. Two heavyweights from the CSU, Alexander Dobrindt and Markus Söder, found themselves in the spotlight recently, debating the legality and morality of border rejections.
On ARD and ZDF, Söder and Dobrindt faced tough scrutiny over their hardline stance on asylum seekers. However, experts like journalist and lawyer Melanie Amann from "Der Spiegel" argue that Dobrindt's policies are misguided and potentially unlawful.
The Law, Explained The matter, according to Amann, is far from clear-cut. Europe law allows asylum seekers to be turned away at the border, but only under exceptional circumstances such as public safety and order. The government, however, seems to be stretching these exceptions thin without providing clear reasons or arguments. Amann accuses the government of playing to symbolism, turning away asylum seekers to show their commitment to an "asylum turnaround."
Criticism Mounts Some European countries are found to be violating the Dublin laws, including Germany itself, admits Amann. Yet, Dobrindt continues to turn away asylum seekers, fueling criticism even within his own coalition. Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig of the SPD has been vocal in her disapproval, but Dobrindt remains unfazed, promising to reform the problematic European rules.
Dobrindt Justifies Overload, Not Emergency Despite the controversy, Dobrindt recently argued that Germany is not in an emergency situation, merely overwhelmed. The concern, he claims, is the inability to manage the influx of migrants, evident in overburdened schools, kindergartens, and housing markets. However, the question remains: how can Dobrindt justify an "overload" without declaring an emergency?
Söder vs Amann Markus Söder, on the other hand, argues that an emergency does exist. Germany faces an integration deficit, Söder contends, but it's not the root cause of the crisis. Instead, he points to the lack of enforcement of European law, which threatens public order. Söder insists that Germany will be justified in protecting its own borders, even if it means facing scrutiny from the European Court of Justice.
Ammann, however, isn't convinced. "Every court will tell you: That's nonsense," she asserts, challenging Söder's interpretation of the situation. Söder, in response, acknowledges the difference in opinions but remains steadfast in his belief that Germany's actions are justified in light of the broader European law violations.
In summary, the ongoing debate over immigration policy in Germany centers around the legality of border rejections, with experts like Melanie Amann questioning Dobrindt's approach and his interpretation of the current situation. As pressure mounts from within and without the coalition, Germany's immigration policies and their legal justification remain a contentious issue.
Enrichment Data:- Dublin Regulation: The Dublin Regulation determines which European Union (EU) member state is responsible for handling an asylum application from an individual entering the European Union. The regulation aims to prevent asylum shoppers (individuals submitting multiple applications in different countries to increase their chances of being granted asylum).- Asylum Procedures Directive: The Asylum Procedures Directive lays out the minimum standards for procedures for granting or refusing asylum in the EU. It covers everything from the initial application to appeals and the return of asylum seekers after a decision has been made.
The ongoing debate about Germany's immigration policies, particularly the legality of border rejections, raises questions about the application of European laws such as the Dublin Regulation and the Asylum Procedures Directive. Experts, like journalist and lawyer Melanie Amann, criticize the government's approaches, suggesting that some policies may be misguided and potentially unlawful.
This heated discussion, further fuelled by the contrasting views of Alexander Dobrindt, Markus Söder, and Melanie Amann, has led to mounting criticism and questions about the interpretation and enforcement of these policies within the coalition and European Union.
