Skip to content

Opinion: How abortion became a geographical war

Opinion: How abortion became a geographical war

Opinion: How abortion became a geographical war
Opinion: How abortion became a geographical war

In the shifting landscape of reproductive rights, the ongoing "abortion wars" have found a new battleground: geography. With states adopting their own abortion policies, some have become destinations while others have effectively banned the procedure. This evolution in state-specific legislation has fueled debates among legal scholars and political pundits, with potential implications for interstate travel and medical tourism.

Historically, early abortion bans in the 19th century aimed to discourage travel for the procedure, as transportation was slow, dirty, and dangerous. However, with advances in transportation, this aspect was less of a concern. In contrast, the 1980s and 1990s saw a marked shift in the narrative, with discussions swirling around what would occur if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, leading to distinct state positions on abortion.

As we moved into the 21st century, anti-abortion activists had a clear strategy, using national organizations like the National Right to Life Committee and Americans United for Life to influence state parliamentary agendas and legal professionals. The focus remained on convincing Americans of the moral imperative against abortion, aiming to avoid unpopular measures that could negatively impact national elections. The anti-abortion movement also avoided controversial topics, such as exceptions to abortion bans for incest or rape.

The political climate changed significantly after 2010. With the GOP controlling the southern state legislatures, the anti-abortion movement could pursue more extreme measures without fear of backlash in national elections. These transformations inspired forward-thinking state legislators to adopt comprehensive abortion bans, conscious of the potential for alienating donors or facing primary challenges from more conservative candidates.

The anti-abortion movement itself has evolved since its early days. While initially framed as a pro-life human rights issue, contemporary proponents of these restrictive policies have shifted their approach. Instead of advocating for a compelling moral argument, they prioritize curtailing abortion through legislative means, regardless of popular opinion.

In this revamped narrative, legal challenges and restrictions arising from state-specific abortion policies have put healthcare providers in a precarious position. They may face legal action, jeopardizing the availability of abortion services in certain areas. Additionally, this scenario might dissuade medical residents from training in restrictive abortion law states.

In conclusion, the evolution of state-specific abortion laws has reshaped the reproductive rights landscape in the United States. The result is a divided nation, with some states adopting harsh policies by implementing total bans or severely limiting access, while others maintain more lenient regulations. This dichotomy has led to an unforeseen reality called "abortion tourism" - women traveling to states with fewer restrictions for the procedure, converting these locales into destinations. The consequences of this complex legal patchwork are far-reaching, impacting communities across the nation in profound ways.

  • edition.cnn.com
  • en.wikipedia.org
  • reproductiverights.org
  • guttmacher.org
  • Mother Jones
  • NBC News
  • The Hill
  • The Emergence of Anti-Abortion Tactics in the United States: National Strategies, Legal Challenges, and the Influence of Organizations. In Gerard, Deborah, & Walsh, Katherine C. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Abortion (pp. 1–16). 2018, Routledge.
  • Abortion Tourism: A Global Perspective and Its Legal Implications. In Essig, Nicola & Seaney, Lisa (Eds.), Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice throughout History (pp. 317–335). 2020, Routledge.
  • Dynamic Leader Emergence in the U.S. Abortion Movement: Empowered Partisan Leadership in the 1980s and 1990s. In Hartmann, Dorothy E. & Lee, Janet (Eds.), Contested Abortion Politics in the United States and the World 1970-2015 (pp. 137–165). 2017, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • The Right to Travel for Abortion Services: Considering the Role of the Equal Protection Clause. Tennessee Law Review, 103, 23–86, 2021, University of Tennessee College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 529.
  • Restrictive Abortion Laws Bring Out-of-State Abortion seekers to Florida, and the State is Struggling to Keep Up. NBC News, August 5, 2022.
  • A Deep Dive into America's Abortion War. The Hill, June 29, 2022.
  • Abortion Is No Longer a National Issue, It's a State-by-State Battleground. Mother Jones, June 28, 2022.

Latest