Skip to content

Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Federal government hesitant about Islamists

Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Federal government hesitant about Islamists

Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Federal government hesitant about Islamists
Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Federal government hesitant about Islamists

Critiquing German Government's Handling of Islamist Threats

Stephan Kramer, the President of the Thuringian Office for the Protection of the Constitution, isn't shy about voicing his displeasure with the German government's handling of Islamist organizations within the country. In a conversation with web.de, Kramer argued that the government's "We won't do anything to you, then you won't do anything to us" strategy turned Germany into a "kind of retreat" for extremist groups, and there's never been a guarantee of peace as a result.

Timing of Hamas and Samidoun Bans

This sentiment was fueled following Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) announcement of a ban on Hamas and the Palestinian network, Samidoun after the 7 October Hamas attack on Israel. The measure went into effect three weeks later. Kramer didn't disagree with the ban's implementation, but he questioned why it wasn't enacted earlier, given the groups’ history of anti-Semitic protests and appearances on the EU's terror list.

Islamist Threats in Germany

Kramer isn't alone in his concerns about the consequences of the Middle East conflict and the presence of the far-right AfD in Germany. He deems the AfD a threat to the Jewish community, citing the party's deliberate attempt to stir up conspiracy theories that have a secret anti-Semitic undertone. If the AfD manages to take power, Kramer considers emigrating to Israel as a Jew.

Background Info:

Germany's counter-terrorism efforts and the proposed ban on extremist Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood involve a complex intertwining of historical, cultural, and political factors.

Historical Context

Islamist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, have evolved from religious and social organizations to political movements advocating for sharia law governance. Germany's response to terrorism, including the Nazis and subsequent Islamist terrorist attacks (such as the 2016 Berlin Christmas Market attack), is a central aspect of the country's modern history.

Contemporary Implications

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, classified as right-wing extremist by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Thuringia, has pushed for the banning of Islamist organizations and strengthened counter-extremism and counter-terrorism policies. However, critics argue these measures could infringe on civil liberties and exacerbate social tensions.

Elon Musk's support for the AfD, with its controversial anti-Muslim stance, reflects a broader current of anti-multicultural sentiment in society. The realisation of counter-extremism policies requires reassessing the potential threats posed by politically motivated violent crimes to ensure the measures are aligned with the actual threats.

Two other Islamist groups, besides Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood, potentially pose threats to Germany, as suggested by German authorities. Simultaneously, the AfD and its attitudes towards political Islam remain a significant German political issue.

Latest