Nuclear Perils in a Modern Cold Conflict (According to Serhii Plokhy)
In the ongoing battle against climate change, nuclear energy, with its low carbon benefits, has long been hailed as a potential cornerstone solution. However, a complex web of psychological fear, institutional vulnerabilities, and unpredictable new risks has posed significant obstacles to its long-term viability.
Public fear of nuclear energy is deeply rooted in perceptions of it as catastrophic, unfamiliar, and controlled by distrusted institutions. This fear, often disproportionate to actual risks, is fuelled by a legacy of nuclear war anxiety, limited public understanding, and misinformation about radiation effects. Such fear can lead to resistance against nuclear projects, slowing their deployment despite nuclear power’s low carbon benefits.
Nuclear energy projects face major institutional challenges. The high upfront costs, complex financing, and long timelines (60-80 years operational life) require stable governance and policies. However, institutional fragility, such as regulatory uncertainties, public opposition, and weakened international treaties concerning nuclear materials, can cause delays, cost overruns, and undermine investment.
Emerging risks such as evolving geopolitical tensions, proliferation concerns, technological mishaps, and even artificial intelligence-related threats introduce further uncertainty to nuclear deployment. These unpredictable risks make long-term planning difficult and raise public and governmental hesitancy. Additionally, constraints on fossil fuels used for nuclear plant construction and maintenance create resource competition, complicating sustainable scale-up.
The implications of these factors are profound. Public opposition driven by fear can delay or block nuclear projects, limiting the essential rapid expansion of low-carbon energy. Institutional weaknesses increase project costs and risk profiles, making nuclear less financially attractive compared to other renewables. Emerging unpredictable risks amplify uncertainty and risk aversion from investors and policymakers.
Together, these factors impair nuclear energy’s ability to scale up quickly and reliably as a key part of climate change mitigation strategies, despite its technical merits. Addressing these challenges requires improved public education, robust institutional frameworks, transparent risk management, and clear communication to rebuild trust and enable nuclear energy’s wider acceptance and deployment.
Meanwhile, in the geopolitical arena, the return of Cold War patterns is evident, though with differences in key players and power dynamics. The vision of a multipolar world with Russia, China, the European Union, and the United States as equal powers has diminished substantially, with Russia's position significantly weakened since 2022, weakening its military and economic power. The current geopolitical landscape shows echoes of the 1950s Beijing-Moscow alliance, but today's emerging bipolar world centers on Washington and Beijing, rather than Washington and Moscow.
The human mind is susceptible to fears of invisible threats like radiation, leading to predictable political responses like decade-long freezes in nuclear development after major accidents. The Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine, seized by Russian forces, has exposed new vulnerabilities as none of the world's 440 reactors were designed to withstand direct military attacks. The Cuban Missile Crisis offers crucial lessons for our current situation, emphasizing the importance of shared fear of nuclear weapons in preventing catastrophe.
As we navigate these complex challenges, it is crucial to remember that our imagination often fails to anticipate the next novel threat. Safety improvements in the nuclear industry after each accident demonstrate our capacity to learn and adapt. However, maintaining the delicate balance that prevented global conflict for over 70 years while operating with leadership that may not fully grasp the existential stakes involved is our greatest challenge. The transatlantic alliance has been reinvigorated, with Eastern European countries showing strong support for Ukraine. Yet, the psychological fear of nuclear energy, institutional vulnerabilities, and unpredictable new risks pose significant challenges to the long-term viability of nuclear energy as a climate change solution.
- Environmental science experts discuss the impact of climate-change fear on attitudes towards nuclear energy, with public fear of nuclear power stemming from perceptions of it as catastrophic, unfamiliar, and controlled by distrusted institutions.
- In the realm of general news, the United Nations urges governments to address institutional challenges facing nuclear energy projects, including high upfront costs, complex financing, and long timelines, as instability in governance and policies can cause delays, cost overruns, and undermine investment.
- As part of the debate on war and conflicts, researchers point out that emerging risks such as geopolitical tensions, proliferation concerns, technological mishaps, and artificial intelligence-related threats pose further uncertainty to nuclear deployment, making long-term planning difficult and increasing public and governmental hesitancy.
){kind=link}