Skip to content

NRA Hails Supreme Court Ruling in Smith & Wesson vs. Mexican Government

The United States Supreme Court has rendered its verdict in the closely monitored legal dispute.

Supreme Court Decision in Smith & Wesson v. Mexican Government Praise by NRA
Supreme Court Decision in Smith & Wesson v. Mexican Government Praise by NRA

NRA Hails Supreme Court Ruling in Smith & Wesson vs. Mexican Government

The Supreme Court of the United States has made a unanimous decision in the case Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, a ruling that has significant implications for the firearms industry and the Second Amendment.

The decision, handed down by the Court, states that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) prevents Mexico from holding American firearms manufacturers liable for violence committed by Mexican drug cartels. This decision marks the end of a strategy by gun control activists to restrict the firearms industry.

The PLCAA, enacted in the early 2000s due to the work of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its members, states that firearm manufacturers are not liable for the criminal misuse of their products. The Court determined that the manufacturers have immunity granted by the PLCAA.

The NRA was significantly involved in supporting the arms manufacturers in the case. John Commerford, Executive Director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), stated that this is a monumental victory for the lawful commerce of constitutionally protected products. Doug Hamlin, NRA Executive Vice President & CEO, added that the Supreme Court's decision correctly renounced tactics used by Mexico and its collaborators to extort and impoverish the American firearms industry.

Gun control activists have long sought to restrict the Second Amendment in the United States, and the case brought by the Government of Mexico is an example of abusive lawsuits that the PLCAA was enacted to prohibit. The NRA also filed a brief arguing for the exact outcome decided by the Court in the case.

However, critics argue that the Supreme Court's decision makes it harder for law-abiding Americans to acquire arms to protect themselves and their loved ones. The PLCAA exception for illegal acts by industry members, if applied to Mexico's suit, would undermine most of the rule. The Supreme Court noted that if Mexico's suit fell within the PLCAA exception for illegal acts by industry members, most of the rule would be nullified.

Despite these criticisms, the decision protects the lawful commerce of constitutionally protected products, including firearms. The NRA and its members will continue to advocate for the Second Amendment and the lawful commerce of firearms in the United States.

Read also:

Latest

Trump's aggressive allegations against Obama regarding the 'Russia-gate' issue serve as a...

Trump's vigorous pursuit of the 'Russia-gate' involving Obama provides a suitable target for his MAGA supporters associated with Epstein. Here's why Trump might struggle to fulfill his promise regarding this matter.

Trump shifts focus from Jeffrey Epstein files onto Tulsi Gabbard, mirroring the president's own efforts to divert attention. However, similar to Trump, Gabbard may find her campaign ending in the same unproductive depths where attempts to prosecute Hillary Clinton were left during Trump's...

MacCombs' legal action promptly met with a response from Candace Owens

Macques' Lawsuit Addresses by Candace Owens

"Conservative figure Candace Owens has countered the defamation lawsuit filed against her by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, with a 'see you in court' statement. Contact for comments was made via email to both parties outside of regular working hours by Newsweek, who...