Skip to content

No legal action taken over maritime accident in India

Regional court in Hamburg dismisses charge of illegal ship dismantling in India
Regional court in Hamburg dismisses charge of illegal ship dismantling in India
  • *

A whiff of questionable proceedings surrounds a German shipping conglomerate, as it apparently avoids a criminal trial for dispatching a container vessel towards an Indian beach—a grim deathbed for ships. The Hamburg's Regional Court has declined the public prosecutor's office's request to slap charges on two of the company's top brass.

According to the prosecutor's case, the boat's captain was coerced to impale the 213-meter giant on the shores of Alang, Gujarat, in India, where it would subsequently meet its demise under hazardous, unregulated conditions. The container ship carried a toxic load of about 14,000 tons of hazardous waste.

The ship's fate

Another suspect is said to have orchestrated the sale of the container ship and its shipping to its watery sundown in Alang. According to indictment, the 2001-built ship was sold in late 2016 for approximately $4.8 million (€4.3 million). The alleged mastermind also reportedly instructed the captain to beach the freighter in Alang, where it sank into oblivion.

Not a German voyage

Although the public prosecutor's claims seem scandalous, the case would likely sidestep punishment in Germany, according to the regional court. Since the ship was transported from Italy to India, with no intention to cross a German border, the incident appears devoid of German jurisdiction.

Even the agreement's signing in Germany doesn't sway this view, as stated by the court spokeswoman. The public prosecutor's office is currently debating whether to appeal the court's verdict, denying the commencement of the trial.

  • India
  • Public Prosecutor's Office
  • Ship
  • German Shipping Company
  • Container Ship
  • Hamburg
  • Hazardous Waste
  • Court System
  • Commitment of Sales
  • Italy
  • Hong Kong

While substantial evidence of charges against a specific German shipping company may be lacking, the wider context of ship scrapping and legal maneuvers can shed some light:

  1. Regulatory Framework: EU countries adhere to the Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) and the Basel Convention's amendments, prohibiting the export of hazardous waste, including end-of-life ships, to non-OECD countries. Additionally, the European Union's Ship Recycling Regulation (SRR) requires EU-flagged vessels to be recycled in approved facilities that meet stringent environmental and safety standards[1][2].
  2. Regulatory Loopholes: Despite these rules, companies often find ways to employ loopholes, such as selling vessels to intermediaries or switching ship flags to avoid non-EU jurisdictions[2]. Enforcement of these regulations varies, with some firms facing hefty fines for violations, such as Seatrade and Altera Infrastructure[1][2].
  3. Specific Cases and Legal Dilemmas: Given allegations against a specific German shipping company, the absence of a criminal trial might be due to:
  4. Evidence Flaws: The prosecution might lack sufficient evidence to establish intent or direct involvement.
  5. Legislative Loopholes: Exploiting flag-switching or working through intermediaries can technically distance the original seller from direct responsibility.
  6. Jurisdictional Binds: International sales can sometimes tangle cases in jurisdictional disputes.
  7. Despite the European Union's efforts to regulate ship scrapping through Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR), Basel Convention's amendments, and the Ship Recycling Regulation (SRR), loopholes often enable shipping companies, like the one under investigation, to bypass these rules.
  8. One way companies dodge these regulations is by selling vessels to intermediaries or changing ship flags to avoid non-EU jurisdictions, as was reportedly the case with the container ship in question.
  9. The lack of a criminal trial for this specific German shipping company might be due to insufficient evidence to prove intent or direct involvement, or it could result from juridical considerations, as the ship was transported from Italy to India without an intended crossing of a German border.

Read also:

Latest