NCEA 2009 Guidelines for IRIS Peer Assessment Conduct
The document titled "NCEA 2009. Policy and Procedures for Conducting IRIS Peer Reviews" has recently surfaced, shedding light on the process of independent external peer review for draft human health assessments under the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) IRIS Program.
This document, with a file size of 1.59 MB, is likely related to the EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Program, which publishes draft human health assessments for various chemicals. The EPA has a Standard Operating Procedure for the independent external peer review of these draft assessments, and the document provides policies and procedures for conducting IRIS Peer Reviews.
The process, as outlined in the document, involves soliciting review from external scientific experts who are independent of the EPA. These experts critically evaluate the scientific methods, data interpretation, and conclusions of the draft assessments, providing written comments. The EPA's IRIS scientists then review these comments, respond to concerns, and revise the assessment as appropriate before its public release.
The general principles of IRIS peer review include the selection of independent experts, the provision of documentation, reviewer comments and evaluation, response and revision, and transparency and public input. While the document does not provide the detailed step-by-step process directly, it could offer insights into the process of conducting reviews under the EPA's IRIS Program's Standard Operating Procedure.
Although the IRIS Program has faced criticism over transparency and rigor, this external peer review process is designed to ensure that IRIS assessments meet scientific standards and contribute objective, high-quality information for regulatory decision-making. However, for precise procedural details, consulting the original 2009 NCEA Policy and Procedures document would be necessary, as the search results do not contain that document’s explicit contents.
[1]: Article Link 1 [2]: Article Link 2 [3]: Article Link 3
[1] The document details the policies and procedures for conducting IRIS Peer Reviews, a process of independent external peer review for draft human health assessments under the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) IRIS Program, falling under the category of policy-and-legislation. [2] This process, rooted in politics, aims to ensure the transparency, rigor, and scientific quality of IRIS assessments, contributing to the general-news landscape of environmental regulation and public health. [3] Critics have questioned the transparency and rigor of the IRIS Program, yet this document provides insights into the mechanisms designed to meet these standards.
