Nations within the European Union exhibit diverging viewpoints regarding Israel's policies and actions.

Disagreements Among EU Countries Over Israel's Approach in Gaza and Iran

Nations within the European Union exhibit diverging viewpoints regarding Israel's policies and actions.

The European Union is facing discord regarding Israel's handling of the Gaza Strip and its recent military conflicts, particularly with Iran. However, the EU leaders have postponed the question of consequences at the Brussels summit.

European leaders demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the unconditional release of all hostages, and for Israel to comply with its obligations under international law. Criticism is also directed towards settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

Regarding Iran, the EU highlights that the country must never acquire nuclear weapons and adhere to its legally binding commitments under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The EU will continue to contribute to diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions and achieve a lasting resolution to the Iranian nuclear issue.

Divisions within the EU are apparent in their stance on Iran and Israel. For example, France holds a more critical position compared to Germany. Despite this, a unilateral statement was not made about the American and Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Germany has avoided criticizing Israel and the USA for the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, emphasizing the need for Israel to change its policy in Gaza and ensure the supply of the population.

Temporarily halting the import of aid shipments to the north of the Gaza Strip, Israel cited concerns about Hamas seizing the goods. Humanitarian aid still reaches the southern part of Gaza.

Several EU governments are calling for tougher action against Israel, with Spain proposing to suspend the EU-Israel partnership agreement valid since 2000. However, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz rejects such consequences, deeming the suspension unfeasible.

Political Implications

• Legal grey areas: Some EU member states support Israel's right to self-defense, while others question its compliance with strict criteria under international law for self-defense. Legal ambiguity obstructs the EU from adopting a unanimous position on Israel's actions against Iran.
• Human rights and economic relations: EU countries differ in their responses to Israel's breach of human rights obligations, with some advocating for sanctions, while others prioritize dialogue. The EU's stance on trade agreements may attract criticism from human rights organizations.
• Historic and political complexities: The EU's foreign policy towards Israel is complicated by varying ties, strategic interests, and domestic political pressures, exacerbating divisions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Potential Consequences of EU Division

• Eroded EU Diplomatic Influence: The EU's lack of unity weakens its ability to act as a coherent diplomatic actor in Middle East peace efforts, diluting its messaging and reducing its leverage to influence events on the ground.
• Conflict Escalation: Without a coordinated response, ongoing violence between Israel, Iran, and Gaza may escalate further, potentially leading to wider regional instability.
• Economic and Human Rights Implications: The EU's hesitancy to impose strong sanctions may be perceived as tacit acceptance of Israel's policies, impacting the EU's credibility on human rights advocacy.
• Internal EU Strains: Persistent divisions over Israel and Iran can deepen cracks within the EU, complicating consensus-building on other foreign policy issues and affecting overall cohesion in external relations.

The EU's divided response to Israel's actions in Gaza and Iran reflects a complex network of legal, political, and strategic differences among member states, affecting the EU's unity, influence, and its role in promoting peace and human rights in the Middle East.

[1] "The EU and Israel: A Complicated Relationship" - European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), 2022

[2] "The EU's Palestinian Policy in a Time of Upheaval" - European Institute of Peace (EIP), 2019

[3] "The EU-Israel Trade Agreement: A Political and Legal Analysis" - Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, 2019

[4] "EU Foreign Policy and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict" - Chatham House, 2018

[5] "The European Union and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Historical, Political, and Diplomatic Complexities" - European Journal of International Relations, 2016

The European Union's community policy should include more clear-cut guidelines for member states regarding their differing positions on Israel's approach in Gaza, Iran, and compliance with international law. The complexity of the economic and monetary union, spanning various aspects like politics, war-and-conflicts, and general-news, is further compounded by the EU's internal divide on these issues.

In the midst of the ongoing disagreements, the EU must strive towards unity to effectively navigate the legal grey areas, maintain its influence in the Middle East, and uphold its commitment to human rights, both domestically and in its external relations.

Read also: