Skip to content

Nations have no necessity for puppy safeguarding

In Michael Schwarz's leading article, he argues that the principle 'those who order, pay' contradicts a federal system that, through the Bundesrat, already affords substantial power to the states.

Countries reject need for canine legislation
Countries reject need for canine legislation

Nations have no necessity for puppy safeguarding

The coming weeks will see a significant test of political prowess for both Friedrich Merz and Lars Klingbeil, as they navigate the complexities of Germany's federal government.

On July 11th, the Bundesrat, the governing body that represents the states in Germany, will make a crucial decision that could shape the future of the federal government. This decision, concerning Merz's political fate, is set to be made amidst a backdrop of ongoing negotiations between Merz and the minister presidents. The next round of these negotiations is scheduled for June 19th.

Meanwhile, Klingbeil's investment boost for the states, amounting to 100 billion euros, is contingent on a crucial condition. The states must be compensated for the estimated 25 billion euros in lost tax revenue that the investment could potentially generate.

The states, unlike the federal government and many municipalities, have managed to avoid going into debt due to the Corona pandemic and the Ukraine war. However, the loss of tax revenue is a concern that needs to be addressed. Compromises to resolve this issue must be in place by the time of the Bundesrat meeting on July 11th.

It's important to note that the states have the ability to block laws if their concerns are not adequately addressed. One of the concerns revolves around election gifts like the mother's pension, which is a policy that the states have expressed reservations about.

Despite the challenges, the states do not need special protection to assert their interests in the face of political conflicts. They are capable of standing up for their rights and ensuring that their concerns are heard and addressed.

For more information, please contact Michael Schwarz at 0711 66601-599 or via email at m.schwarz@our website.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (Sources discussing broader federal political topics but not specifically detailing a political conflict between the German federal government and the states about the Bundesrat's decision on Friedrich Merz's fate or about compensation for lost tax revenue to the states.)

  1. The states are expected to closely watch the policy-and-legislation developments related to Friedrich Merz's political future in the federal government, given the upcoming Bundesrat decision that could significantly impact their interests.
  2. The complexities of the politics surrounding Lars Klingbeil's investment boost for the states, contingent on compensation for lost tax revenue, might set a new precedent in the realm of general-news, as it highlights the importance of inter-governmental negotiations and compromise in shaping policy.

Read also:

    Latest