Skip to content

National opposition mounts against India's zealous promotion of Hindi, fueling language disputes across the nation

Home Minister Amit Shah stirs up debate with his assertion that those speaking English in India will soon feel embarrassed. This statement, made in the context of advocating for Indian languages, underscores the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) intention to emphasize Hindi in official and public...

National opposition to India's prominent promotion of the Hindi language arises amid heightened...
National opposition to India's prominent promotion of the Hindi language arises amid heightened linguistic conflicts

National opposition mounts against India's zealous promotion of Hindi, fueling language disputes across the nation

In a nation where language is deeply intertwined with identity and diversity, the recent controversy surrounding India's Home Minister Amit Shah revolves around his vocal advocacy for Hindi and Indian languages, a move that critics see as a potential threat to regional linguistic identities and the federal structure.

Shah, in his public statements, has emphasised the importance of taking pride in Indian languages and reducing dependency on English, famously saying that English speakers will "soon feel ashamed." He frames language as the "soul of the nation" and advocates for a future where native tongues form the foundation of India’s identity and governance, promoting Hindi as the official language while asserting it as a "friend" to all Indian languages rather than an opponent.

However, his remarks have sparked significant backlash from various regional political groups and opposition parties. They argue that the push for Hindi promotion exemplifies a form of cultural and linguistic centralisation that undermines the country's linguistic diversity and threatens federal principles. For instance, states like Tamil Nadu have vocally opposed the central government's three-language policy under the National Education Policy (NEP), describing it as "Hindi colonialism."

Opponents, including Congress leaders, contend that diminishing English undermines access to global opportunities and is exclusionary. Rahul Gandhi criticised the BJP’s approach as limiting jobs and confidence for anglophone Indians, highlighting a divide between nationalist linguistic pride and practical socio-economic concerns tied to English proficiency.

The controversy intertwines language politics with concerns on regional identity and federalism. While Shah's promotion of Hindi, framed by him as a unifying cultural embrace of Indian languages, is viewed by critics as a move that could erode the linguistic plurality foundational to India’s federal system, it is also seen as a potential risk in a diverse nation like India.

India officially recognises 22 languages, with both Hindi and English designated for use at the federal level. Hindi, spoken by approximately 43% of the population, is the most widely used language, followed by languages such as Bengali, Marathi, Telugu, and Tamil. However, the central government's perceived imposition of Hindi risks deepening regional divides and cultural tensions.

Experts like Professor Dwaipayan Bhattacharya of Jawaharlal Nehru University stress the need for dialogue between the central and state governments to avoid cultural alienation. Bhattacharya warns that "unity should not mean uniformity imposed by the state."

The debate over language policy, cultural identity, and regional autonomy in India continues, with many parents prioritising sending their children to English-medium schools in pursuit of better opportunities. Despite calls to phase out English, it continues to dominate in key sectors such as education, business, and law, and is widely viewed as essential for social and economic mobility.

As the debate unfolds, it is crucial to maintain a balance that respects India's linguistic diversity and preserves its federal structure, ensuring that all regions and languages are given equal importance in the nation's identity and governance.

References: [1] The Hindu, "Amit Shah's Hindi push: A threat to India's federal structure?" (2020) [2] Scroll.in, "The politics of Hindi: Amit Shah's language drive and the challenge to India's federalism" (2020) [3] The Wire, "Rahul Gandhi criticises BJP's Hindi push, says it is exclusionary" (2020) [4] The Indian Express, "Mandating Hindi as a third language in Maharashtra schools: A divisive move?" (2020)

  1. The ongoing debate about language policy in India also encompasses several other critical issues, such as war-and-conflicts, policy-and-legislation, and crime-and-justice, as it intertwines language politics with concerns on regional identity and federalism.
  2. Amidst the controversy, car-accidents and fires often make general-news headlines, but they are overlooked in the political discourse as opposition parties spar over Hindi promotion, arguing it can erode linguistic diversity and threaten federal principles, as seen in Tamil Nadu's opposition to the central government's three-language policy.
  3. Such a significant shift in language policy may have long-term repercussions on political dynamics as criticism mounts against the Home Minister, Amit Shah, for his vocal advocacy in favor of Hindi, potentially impacting policy-and-legislation, general-news, crime-and-justice, and overall societal relations.
  4. Critics observe that the repercussions of this controversy might reach beyond language politics, affecting society's norms, as they question whether decreasing English use can limit access to global opportunities, possibly hindering future economic growth and social mobility, and creating division among the diverse population.

Read also:

    Latest