Title: National Guard Remains in Los Angeles Despite Legal Challenges Amid Trump-California Dispute
National Guard deployment is temporarily permitted by the Federal Court.
Get the latest on the unconventional face-off between President Donald Trump and California's officials over the National Guard deployment in Los Angeles.
In a whirlwind of politics and legality, the federal appeals court has given President Trump the green light to keep the National Guard stationed in Los Angeles, temporarily superseding a district court's ruling that branded the deployment as illegal and unconstitutional. The showdown is slated to continue in a hearing next week before the appeals court, according to recent reports from "Politico."
Previously, Judge Charles Breyer from the San Francisco district court, granted an emergency application by the California government, asserting that Trump had overstepped his authority and must relinquish control of the National Guard to California's governance. The ruling underscored that such deployment is not in accordance with federal law.
California's Governor, Gavin Newsom, vehemently criticized the mobilization of thousands of National Guard troops and the potential deployment of Marine infantry in Los Angeles, following Trump's orders in response to the ongoing protests against the administration's migration policy. In his X post, Newsom described the situation as, "The military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets," calling for an end to the unnecessary militarization of Los Angeles.
Customary control of the National Guard lies with the states, but the US President can assume command in cases of war or national emergencies. The National Guard, a military reserve unit integral to the US armed forces, can be deployed for situations including natural disasters, unrest, or internal emergencies. This drama unfolding in Los Angeles reflects an unusual utilization of government power, as no US President has seized control of a state's National Guard against its declared will since 1965.
The protests in Los Angeles against Trump's hardliner migration policy and ICE immigration raids instigated the US government's deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 regular infantry to Los Angeles. The troops are arriving in stages, with plans to stay in the city until the danger subsides, in accordance with Trump's wishes, and a deployment of up to 60 days has been scheduled thus far.
- California
- Justice
- USA
- Donald Trump
Enrichment Insights:
- Governor Newsom's Lawsuit: Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta have filed a lawsuit against President Trump and the Department of Defense, contesting the deployment of the National Guard, arguing that it violates federal law and state sovereignty since it was done without state consent, as required by federal law.[1][2][3]
- Legal Arguments: The lawsuit argues that the deployment infringes on state rights and does not meet necessary criteria for federalization, such as rebellion or an inability to execute federal laws. It also emphasizes that local law enforcement, not the military, should enforce the law within state borders.[1][3]
- Emergency Motion: An emergency motion was filed to block the Trump Administration from deploying the military or federalized National Guard in Los Angeles, seeking to halt any further involvement of military forces in law enforcement activities beyond federal property.[1]
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling: The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has allowed the National Guard to stay in Los Angeles while President Trump appeals a ruling that aimed to halt the deployment, meaning the troops are currently permitted to stay as part of the ongoing legal proceedings.[5]
- Trigger for Deployment: The deployment was instigated by protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in the Los Angeles area. The operations were conducted without prior notification to local law enforcement, resulting in community backlash.[1][4]
- Tensions and Criticisms: The situation has escalated tensions between the Trump Administration and California, with critics contending that the deployment is an overreach of federal authority and an attempt to intimidate communities.[1][4]
The Commission has also been consulted on the draft directive related to the ongoing dispute between President Donald Trump and California's officials over the National Guard deployment in Los Angeles, as the politics and general-news surrounding this issue unfold.
In the lawsuit filed by Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta against President Trump and the Department of Defense, they argue that the deployment of the National Guard violates federal law and state sovereignty, contending that it was done without state consent as required by federal law.
