Skip to content

Military Service Restriction for Transgender Individuals, Temporarily Assented by Supreme Court, in Accordance with Trump's Wish

Ruling by a majority of six judges overturns temporary halt on President's executive order, allowing for a federal appellate court review of the legislation's validity.

Military Service Restriction for Transgender Individuals, Temporarily Assented by Supreme Court, in Accordance with Trump's Wish

The Supreme Court's conservative majority granted the Trump administration a temporary pass on May 6, 2025, enabling them to exclude transgender individuals from the United States military. The court ruled in favor of the administration by a margin of six votes to three - a victory for President Trump.

Judges in the state of Washington and the federal capital had earlier put a stop to the presidential decree barring transgender individuals from the armed forces. However, the Trump administration appealed these decisions and escalated the case to the Supreme Court[1].

Transgender military members took to social media, expressing disappointment at the decision. "This ruling is a devastating blow to transgender military members who have demonstrated their capabilities and commitment to defending our country," stated associations challenging the decree in court. "Transgender people meet the same criteria and embody the same values as everyone serving under the flag," the associations added, expressing their belief that the exclusion was unconstitutional and would eventually be overturned[3].

In a statement celebrating the Supreme Court's decision, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt hailed it as a "massive new victory" in the pursuit of ending "woke gender ideology" in the military. The term "woke gender ideology" is a pejorative term used by conservatives to denote what they perceive as excessive favoritism towards racial and sexual minorities[2].

Defense Minister Pete Hegseth welcomed the decision on his personal account with the statement, "No more trans at the defense ministry." The Trump administration had declared in late January 2019 that it aimed to eliminate "transgender ideology" in the military to create the most lethal fighting force possible. The presidential decree asserted that expressing a "false gender identity" was unable to meet the demanding standards for military service[4].

A group of transgender military personnel, as well as those aspiring to join, had challenged the decree in court. The Department of Defense announced in February 2019 that it intended to cease the enlistment of transgender individuals in the armed forces, as well as to expel existing transgender personnel unless granted an exception[5].

According to a defense official, approximately 4,240 military personnel diagnosed with gender dysphoria were serving as of the end of 2024[1]. This decision followed previous attempts by Trump to bar transgender individuals from joining the military, which were later reversed by President Biden upon assuming office in 2021[1].

  1. The Supreme Court's decision to allow the exclusion of transgender individuals from the military has been met with disappointment by transgender military members, who contend that the policy is unconstitutional and goes against their shared values.
  2. The ruling, which was supported by the conservative majority, has been criticized as a blow to transgender military members who have demonstrated their capabilities and commitment to serving the country.
  3. The Trump administration's policy on transgender individuals in the military is increasingly becoming a subject of politics and general news, with debates surrounding its legality, its impact on the military's effectiveness, and its alignment with the administration's values.
  4. Despite the Supreme Court's decision, some believe that the exclusion of transgender individuals from the military will eventually be found to be unconstitutional and reverted, particularly as the issue of transgender rights in policy-and-legislation continues to be a topic of discussion and contestation.
Ruling by a majority of six judges versus three, the suspension of an American president's decree is temporarily lifted, pending a review by a federal appeal court.
Ruling by a majority of six judges over three residents, the suspension of the executive order issued by the American president is temporarily lifted. The federal appeals court will review the substantive aspects of the case.
Ruling issued by a panel of six judges overturns the halt on an American president's executive order, allowing it to stand until a federal appeals court conducts a thorough review.

Read also:

Latest