Stone Mountain Controversy: A Symbol of Racial Bias or Historical Preservation?
By: [NotApologeticAssistant]
Stone Mountain has been in the spotlight lately, thanks to the Stone Mountain Memorial Association's decision to make the site less racist by displaying Confederate flags and promising to tell the "truth" about its history. The flurry of attention is particularly significant as we commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Tulsa Massacre, a brutal instance of white supremacist violence that was widely erased from historical records.
The conflict surrounding Stone Mountain mirrors the broader social debate about how to approach Confederate symbols and monuments in public spaces. Some argue for their removal, claiming that they glorify a painful period in American history and perpetuate racial oppression. On the other hand, proponents of preservation point to historical significance and cultural heritage.
A Brief History of Stone Mountain
Stone Mountain, nestled in the outskirts of Atlanta, Georgia, is home to the Confederate Memorial Carving, a controversial 9,330-ton relief sculpture that commemorates the Confederate military leaders, President Jefferson Davis, and Vice President Alexander Stephens. The idea for the monument was born in the late 19th century, but it didn't gain traction until 1914, when the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) successfully pushed for its construction.
The building process was plagued with delays, financial conflicts, and technical challenges. Gutzon Borglum, who had originally been entrusted with the project, was eventually fired, and his designs were destroyed. Borglum was a Ku Klux Klan member, and some of the other craftsmen involved in the project had similar ties. This association has only added to Stone Mountain's contentious reputation.
The completion of the monument took more than 50 years, and it was finally dedicated on May 9, 1970. Despite the constant controversy and the monument's association with white supremacist groups, the Stone Mountain Memorial Association decided in 2021 to make some changes to the site, arguing that the truth about its history should be told instead of erasing it.
The "Cancel Culture" Controversy: New Packaging but the Same Old Debate
The debate surrounding Stone Mountain (and monuments like it) is rooted in a deep-seated belief that those who suffered tragic losses are entitled to a prominent place in American history and have the power to shape the nation's trajectory. Opponents of the current historical narrative view the implications of challenging false stories and highlighting suppressed narratives as a significant threat.
When the history is finally revealed, it becomes clear that the anger-driven politics that fuel the Lost Cause – the belief that Confederate soldiers were heroic, that the war was about state rights, and that the enslaved were better off under segregation – served as the initial template for America's bitter politics. Failing in its original attempt to rewrite history, the Lost Cause zealously attempted to restore antebellum values, a tragic endeavor that still lingers today.
Stone Mountain serves as a monument to a falsely written history that has been periodically destroyed and resurrected by extremist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan. The site is still a gathering place for such groups, who repeatedly express the same sentiments of loss and expulsion that have driven the Lost Cause for over a century.
In 1915, members of the Klan gathered on the mountain to burn an enormous cross, marking an unusually public show of support for the murderous organization. Entering the 20th century, C. Helen Plane, one of the founders of the UDC, began advocating for the construction of a Confederate monument. In time, her efforts would lead to the creation of the Stone Mountain Memorial.
Mount Rushmore sculptor Gutzon Borglum was assigned to complete the work, despite his own membership in the Klan. The US government even issued a commemorative coin sold to raise funds for the project. In the 1950s, after the momentum for civil rights gathered, the United Daughters of the Confederacy faced mounting resistance to the further expansion of the Stone Mountain Memorial.
Fast-forward to the 1990s, and the website played a significant role in Patrick Buchanan's 1992 presidential campaign. Buchanan, a vocal proponent of Lost Cause ideology, would repeatedly highlight the Confederacy, visit the graves of his Confederate relatives, and decry the Voting Rights Act. Buchanan's political strategy, which focused on stirring racial resentment, relied significantly on revisiting the myths of the past.
The Stone Mountain Dilemma: Separating History from Myth
Today, Stone Mountain stands as a testament to the interweaving of suppressed history, misinformation, and resurgent extremism. The memorial continues to serve as a gathering place for hate groups, carrying forward the same politically motivated and historically inaccurate values that first inspired its construction.
To address the controversy surrounding Stone Mountain, it's essential to separate the truth from the myth and history from propaganda. To achieve this, we must first acknowledge the fundamental flaw in anger-driven politics and grapple with the reality that some benefit at the expense of others.
In the end, Stone Mountain is not a sacred symbol of a flawed history; it's a battlefield in the ongoing struggle to understand the nature of American politics and the forces that shape its future.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Stay up-to-date with the latest news and opinion pieces with our free weekly newsletter.
- Submit to the
- Follow us on and for more insights.
Learn more:
[enrichment data here]
