Melania Trump calls for Hunter Biden to recant 'explicitly suggestive' remarks about Epstein matter
Hunter Biden has refused to retract his comments linking Melania Trump, the former First Lady, to Jeffrey Epstein, despite a demand for a retraction and a potential billion-dollar defamation lawsuit.
Melania Trump's attorney, Alejandro Brito, issued a cease-and-desist letter to Biden in August, stating that the claims were false, defamatory, and had caused her "overwhelming financial and reputational harm." The letter was first reported by Fox News Digital.
The comments were made by Biden in a June interview with American journalist Andrew Callaghan, during which he lashed out at "elites" and others in the Democratic Party. Biden attributed the claim about Melania Trump to author Michael Wolff.
Since the comments were made, Melania Trump has disputed the claim, stating that she was introduced to Donald Trump, her future husband, by Paolo Zampolli, a modeling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. The president and first lady have consistently maintained this version of events.
Despite the legal threat, Biden has chosen to stand by his comments rather than retract them. When offered an opportunity to do so on Andrew Callaghan's YouTube program, he responded with profanity.
As of mid-August 2025, there are reports indicating legal action is planned or underway, but no confirmed lawsuit filing details have been publicly disclosed yet. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer who represents Hunter Biden, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The comments made by Biden were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world. The situation echoes the strategy of Melania Trump's husband, who has used litigation against critics in the past.
Read also:
- Today's most impactful photographic moments
- Support for Eric Adams in The Post's Letters to the Editor on August 13, 2025
- Roosting Shark and Rambunctious Red Squirrels: Unconventional House Rental in Yorkshire Involving Aquatic Marvel, Squirrely Mayhem, and Mystical Planning Regulations
- Legal Dispute Dismissed with Humor: Supreme Court Laughs off Another Civil Matter Mislabeled as Criminal Prosecution
